source-gladly: use AwareDatetime for timestamp fields #1316
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
williamhbaker
force-pushed
the
wb/gladly-timestamps
branch
from
e92fa3d
to
e945da3
Compare
Type the `timestamp` field of events as an AwareDatetime, so they are validated and formatted as `date-time`.
williamhbaker
force-pushed
the
wb/gladly-timestamps
branch
from
e945da3
to
8a26a97
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Type the
timestampfield of events as an AwareDatetime, so they are validated and formatted asdate-time.Description:
(Describe the high level scope of new or changed features)
Workflow steps:
(How does one use this feature, and how has it changed)
Documentation links affected:
(list any documentation links that you created, or existing ones that you've identified as needing updates, along with a brief description)
Notes for reviewers:
(anything that might help someone review this PR)
This change is