Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner(migration): support migrating to a completely different node #369

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

csegarragonz
Copy link
Collaborator

@csegarragonz csegarragonz commented Feb 1, 2024

In this PR we introduce support to migrate an application to a complete different set of nodes if that improves its co-location.

For example, if we have the following deployment:

Node 1: [A][A][B][B]
Node 2: [A][A][C][C]
Node 3: [ ][ ][ ][ ]

before, we would not detect a migration opportunity for app A. Now we do.

@csegarragonz csegarragonz marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2024 09:44
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d7d8e97) 81.79% compared to head (0afec89) 81.90%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #369      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.79%   81.90%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         106      106              
  Lines        7997     8013      +16     
==========================================
+ Hits         6541     6563      +22     
+ Misses       1456     1450       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@csegarragonz csegarragonz merged commit b31abc1 into main Feb 2, 2024
12 checks passed
@csegarragonz csegarragonz deleted the migrate-new-hosts branch February 2, 2024 17:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant