Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more customizations of get_return_address #635

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ispeters
Copy link
Contributor

@ispeters ispeters commented Sep 11, 2024

This PR adds customizations of unifex::get_return_address to the algorithms we plan to showcase in our CppCon talk; more algorithms to come later.

This PR adds customizations of `unifex::get_return_address` to the
algorithms we plan to showcase in our CppCon talk; more algoriths to
come later.
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Sep 11, 2024
@ispeters ispeters force-pushed the add_return_addresses branch from d076716 to 8d66012 Compare September 11, 2024 18:32
@ispeters ispeters marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2024 18:41
@ispeters ispeters merged commit 9168291 into main Sep 11, 2024
101 checks passed
@ispeters ispeters deleted the add_return_addresses branch September 11, 2024 18:49
ispeters added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
This PR continues what was started in #635 and adds more customizations
of `get_return_address`, starting with `task<>`.
ispeters added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
This PR continues what was started in #635 and adds more customizations
of `get_return_address`, starting with `task<>`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants