Improve Modal Consistency

[tsmith123]

This PR makes the modals on the Home page more consistent.

Also, due to Gateway UI not being production ready, it offers a way to prevent new Gateways being added. (This is only a suggestion so please let me know if this approach is too heavy handed and you prefer a different approach).

• Move action buttons on add and edit service modals to the right hand side
• Make spacing consistent across add, edit and delete service modals
• Adds translation for new error message
• Adds translation for existing error message

New Delete Service Modal

New Edit Service Modal

New Add Service Modal

Add Service Modal (with error message)

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
ui	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Feb 7, 2025 8:37am

[elsirion]

Sounds good enough for now, let's work on GW UI once we got a stable release again

[joschisan]

Also, due to Gateway UI not being production ready, it offers a way to prevent new Gateways being added. (This is only a suggestion so please let me know if this approach is too heavy handed and you prefer a different approach).

@elsirion @tsmith123 I think we should consider to deprecate the gateway UI for now and eventually remove it due to the following reasons:

• gateway operators are technical and can just use cli, @m1sterc001guy uses it to manage our gateway and it works well.
• gateway changes quicker and is therefore harder to maintain
• gateway has more functionality that we would have to display, lnv2 will also add channel management etc. at the same time the guardian UI mostly needs to display information.

Therefore the value / cost ratio seems to differ significantly for gateway and guardian UI.

[elsirion]

As discussed on the call, in the short term the Guardian UI is more important indeed, but if we want more people to run gateways eventually we need to visualize the complex data associated with them. In that sense a good UI is even more important for Gateways than Guardians, there's just much more information.

I also see community-run Gateways as a crucial component for widespread Fedimint adoption. Professional Gateway providers will always need to take custody of some user funds since they don't have a trust relationship to the federation. Having community members with a trust relationship run Gateways fixes this. We are already working towards that by integrating LDK, which should ultimately allow zero-management Gateways by connecting to an LSP.

[tsmith123]

Thanks for the input. What I will do is restore the original logic re: gateways on this PR to keep it just abut the modals. Then I will create a new PR to prevent a user accessing the Gateway UI as a temporary measure but I will probably tackle it on the password page as this current approach would be bypassed unwittingly by providing the Gateway Url Env Var anwyay.

[alexlwn123]

nice. LGTM. fyi, if you haven't already, we should update the readme & just scripts to reflect the disabled gateway ui