-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FIP-0100: Removing Batch Balancer, Replacing It With a Per-sector Fee and Removing Gas-limited Constraints #1113
Conversation
We are proposing a FIP for replacing the batch balance with a new per sector fee and be able to support more batching/aggregation.
Where is the discussion of this FIP? |
6e782db
to
6800e5f
Compare
6800e5f
to
ee4576d
Compare
@beck-8 the fip discussion is here #1105 (also linked in the table at the beginning of the FIP text) Having a per sector fee instead of the batch balancer fee actually simplify the system offering more predictable cost. About termination, we are actually considering a discount on having to pay the remaining of the new fee given termination fee is already applied. Thanks for pointing this out! |
@irenegia Thank you for your reply. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Proposed to give this FIP-0099 FIP-0100 - also a few open clarifications needed to confirm which implementation + design pathway is confirmed of the options proposed.
Please add questions & comments to the discussion issue at #1105 |
Co-authored-by: MollyM <[email protected]>
What are the cost and gas implications for an average miner sealing 100TiB daily under the proposed per-sector fee model compared to the current Batch Balancer? |
Applying changes for naming to FIP-0100
per sector fee description improved, fee paid at termination removed
All outstanding FIP editor questions / comments appear to have been addressed. ✅ Merging this PR to officially land this draft FIP - discussion may continue in #1105 and further details may be added to the specification via future PRs as implementation proceeds. |
typos
also updated the content in the appendix
fixed broken link
CS graph updated in the appendix
This FIP aims to enhance the efficiency and economic sustainability of the Filecoin network by removing batch fees from precommit and provecommit methods, introducing a per-sector fee for a more stable cost structure, and eliminating outdated protocol constraints made redundant by improved gas accounting.