Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MODSER-56: Internal omission/combination pieces not expanding fields #116

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

Jack-Golding
Copy link
Contributor

Previously, internal recurrence/omission/combination pieces were not expanding the fields contained within their models, in order to fix this, the internal piece view file has been changes to dynamically select the correct internal piece view file based on the class, additionally a class field has been added to allow for easier identification of the piece class on the front end

Previously, internal recurrence/omission/combination pieces were not expanding the fields contained within their models, in order to fix this, the internal piece view file has been changes to dynamically select the correct internal piece view file based on the class, additionally a class field has been added to allow for easier identification of the piece class on the front end
@Jack-Golding Jack-Golding merged commit 766cb9b into master Oct 22, 2024
5 checks passed
@Jack-Golding Jack-Golding deleted the fix/modser-56 branch October 22, 2024 15:49
Jack-Golding added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
Previously, internal recurrence/omission/combination pieces were not expanding the fields contained within their models, in order to fix this, the internal piece view file has been changes to dynamically select the correct internal piece view file based on the class, additionally a class field has been added to allow for easier identification of the piece class on the front end
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant