Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ExecutionDigest #767

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2023
Merged

ExecutionDigest #767

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2023

Conversation

swalker2m
Copy link
Contributor

Adds an ExecutionDigest, which is just the combination of setup time and the acquisition and science SequenceDigests.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 71.42% and project coverage change: +0.30 🎉

Comparison is base (af3bfb4) 78.71% compared to head (91ac194) 79.01%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #767      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.71%   79.01%   +0.30%     
==========================================
  Files         111      112       +1     
  Lines        1480     1487       +7     
  Branches        3        4       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1165     1175      +10     
+ Misses        315      312       -3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...a/core/model/sequence/arb/ArbExecutionDigest.scala 71.42% <71.42%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Collaborator

@cquiroz cquiroz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@swalker2m swalker2m merged commit daf7df5 into master Jul 21, 2023
9 checks passed
@swalker2m swalker2m deleted the execution-digest branch July 21, 2023 19:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants