[WIP] Chapter 8 - mapping #19
Conversation
asinghvi17
force-pushed
the
as/08-mapping
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7b0e823
to
a95bd50
Compare
asinghvi17
force-pushed
the
as/08-mapping
branch
from
3d2dc39
to
fe81d7b
Compare
| In this chapter, we provide a comprehensive summary of the most useful workflows of these two methods for creating static maps (@sec-static-maps). | ||
| Static maps can be easily shared and viewed (whether digitally or in print), however they can only convey as much information as a static image can. | ||
| Interactive maps provide much more flexibilty in terms of user experience and amount of information, however they often require more work to design and effectively share. | ||
| Thus, in @sec-interactive-maps, we move on to elaborate on the `.explore` method for creating interactive maps, which was also briefly introduced earlier in @sec-vector-layers. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We may not need to split static/interactive into sections as there's little difference
✅ Deploy Preview for courageous-phoenix-f7cc3c ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
@Nowosad it looks like the Netlify preview isn't working for this PR? https://deploy-preview-19--courageous-phoenix-f7cc3c.netlify.app/ |
|
@asinghvi17 yes -- because the render failed, see https://github.com/geocompx/geocompjl/actions/runs/10983624666/job/30493218544?pr=19: in short, the issue is that you call the data as |
|
It's strange because this was working before, maybe it's an issue with the Quarto setup changing. We set |
|
@asinghvi17 I think I fixed all of the tiny issues and the PR renders to a preview website! |
|
Thanks @Nowosad! I think I missed that the data path argument had been changed on main :) |
|
I'm thinking about adding some colormap suggestions. What would people think about:
|
|
TODOs for tomorrow / later:
|
this may be my favourite chapter ;)