Added more keywords/rules based on the inclusivenaming.org

[DariuszPorowski]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

• The commit message follows our guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features) see docs/README.md

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

• Added more rules based on inclusivenaming.org

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

• Limited number of keywords

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

• More keywords to detect during the scan

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make due to this PR?)

N/A

Other information:

N/A

[github-actions]

👋 Thanks for submitting your first PR!

Please be sure to read and follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing guide.

⭐️ Is your org or open source project using woke? If so, we'd love for you to be included in the 'Who uses woke' list at https://github.com/get-woke/woke/blob/main/docs/about.md#who-uses-woke.

[DariuszPorowski]

Hi @caitlinelfring I'd just like to follow up about this PR.

[tyll]

According to https://github.com/get-woke/woke/blob/main/docs/rules.md woke supports categories. inclusivenaming.org also has tier 1 - tier 3 categories. It seems it would be useful to specify the categories here as well to benefit from being able indluce/exclude categories.

[DariuszPorowski]

@tyll makes sense. happy to do that, but it looks like woke is abandoned project, @caitlinelfring?