Remove old List use introduced by another branch from base_store.py #1162
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nekohayo
added
bug
priority:critical
regression
|
Merged, thanks! |
diegogangl
added this to the 0.7: "Getting things Gradius — Destroy the core!" milestone
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR #1158 aimed to remove all outdated
typing.Listreferences form thebase_store.pyfile. However, PR #1159 introduced a new one in the meantime that was not considered by 1158. When 1158 was merged, it caused all sorts of errors (e.g., failing the GHA tests) because of the now missingtyping.Listimport.