Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: refactor valopers to remove r/sys/validators dependency #3830

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

D4ryl00
Copy link
Contributor

@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 commented Feb 26, 2025

fixes #3567

Process to be a validator:

  1. Register your validator node as a Valoper. You should fill out the question fields in the /r/gnoland/valopers.Valoper structure.
  2. Make a GovDao proposal to add you to the validator valset (/r/sys/validators/v2).
  3. The Dao members vote.
  4. After acceptance, the proposal must be executed to be effective.

This is a script to help you to test the whole flow with the test1 gnokey key.

#!/bin/sh -x

cat >register_valoper.gno <<END
package main

import (
	"std"

	"gno.land/r/gnoland/valopers"
)

func main() {
	valoper := valopers.Valoper{
		Name:        "berty",
		Description: "Berty's validator",
		ProfileAddress: "g1jg8mtutu9khhfwc4nxmuhcpftf0pajdhfvsqf5",
		OtherNetworks: "no other networks",
		DigitalPresence: "https://berty.tech, https://twitter.com/berty, https://crpt.fyi/berty-discord, https://github.com/berty, https://medium.com/berty-tech, https://www.linkedin.com/company/berty",
		AssetsManagement: "",
		ValidatingInterest: "help to decentralize the network",
		Contributions: "https://github.com/gnolang/hackerspace/issues/28, https://github.com/gnolang/hackerspace/issues/51, https://github.com/gnolang/hackerspace/issues/92",
		Address:     std.Address("g1ut590acnamvhkrh4qz6dz9zt9e3hyu499u0gvl"),
		PubKey:      "gpub1pggj7ard9eg82cjtv4u52epjx56nzwgjyg9zq2gncppkfzmx7s22mn60mf0uxzzpl23yx97hwmwm8yc6lupepqqnlexfch",
		Active:      true,
	}

	valopers.Register(valoper)
}
END

cat >vote_proposal.gno <<END
package main

import (
	"gno.land/r/gov/dao/bridge"
)

func main() {
  bridge.GovDAO().VoteOnProposal(0, "YES")
}
END

cat >execute_proposal.gno <<END
package main

import (
	"gno.land/r/gov/dao/bridge"
)

func main() {
  bridge.GovDAO().ExecuteProposal(0)
}
END

gnokey maketx run \
  -gas-fee 1000000ugnot \
  -gas-wanted 20000000 \
  -broadcast \
  -chainid dev \
  -remote "tcp://127.0.0.1:26657" \
  test1 ./register_valoper.gno

gnokey maketx call \
  -pkgpath "gno.land/r/gnoland/valoper_dao_proposal" \
  -func "MakeProposal" \
  -gas-fee 1000000ugnot \
  -gas-wanted 20000000 \
  -broadcast \
  -chainid "dev" \
  -args "g1ut590acnamvhkrh4qz6dz9zt9e3hyu499u0gvl" \
  -send "100000000ugnot" \
  -remote "tcp://127.0.0.1:26657" \
  test1

gnokey maketx run \
  -gas-fee 1000000ugnot \
  -gas-wanted 20000000 \
  -broadcast \
  -chainid dev \
  -remote "tcp://127.0.0.1:26657" \
  test1 ./vote_proposal.gno

gnokey maketx run \
  -gas-fee 1000000ugnot \
  -gas-wanted 20000000 \
  -broadcast \
  -chainid dev \
  -remote "tcp://127.0.0.1:26657" \
  test1 ./execute_proposal.gno

@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 marked this pull request as draft February 26, 2025 10:24
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 🧾 package/realm Tag used for new Realms or Packages. label Feb 26, 2025
@Gno2D2 Gno2D2 requested a review from a team February 26, 2025 10:25
@Gno2D2
Copy link
Collaborator

Gno2D2 commented Feb 26, 2025

🛠 PR Checks Summary

🔴 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
  • IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
  • The pull request description provides enough details
Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)
🔴 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:
  1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
  2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
    • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
    • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
    • Update documentation, if required.
    • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
    • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
  1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.
📚 Resources:
Debug
Automated Checks
Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: D4ryl00/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🔴 Requirement not satisfied
└── 🔴 If
    ├── 🔴 Condition
    │   └── 🔴 Or
    │       ├── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the organization reviewed the pull request (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🔴 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🔴 Else
        └── 🔴 And
            ├── 🟢 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending
            └── 🔴 On no pull request

Manual Checks
**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

  • Any user with comment edit permission
The pull request description provides enough details

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: core-contributors)
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is user: dependabot[bot])

Can be checked by

  • team core-contributors

@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 changed the title Chore: refactor valopers Feat: refactor valopers to remove r/sys/validators dependency Feb 26, 2025
@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 changed the title Feat: refactor valopers to remove r/sys/validators dependency feat: refactor valopers to remove r/sys/validators dependency Feb 26, 2025

// MakeProposal creates a proposal to the GovDAO
// for adding the given valoper to the validator set.
func MakeProposal(strAddress string) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why strAddress string and not just std.Address?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 Feb 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be able to call this function from gnokey CLI directly, e.g.:
gnokey maketx call -pkgpath "gno.land/r/gnoland/valoper_dao_proposal" -func "MakeProposal" -gas-fee 1000000ugnot -gas-wanted 20000000 -broadcast -chainid "dev" -args "g1jg8mtutu9khhfwc4nxmuhcpftf0pajdhfvsqf5" -remote "tcp://127.0.0.1:26657" test1
and so don't need to create a gno file to create a std.Address object and run it with gnokey maketx run....

Do you think it isn't worth it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

proposal.MakeProposal calls simpledao.Propose under the wood. This function requires us to send some coins to succeed.
So if func MakeProposal(strAddress string) as its parameter as a string, we can call it directly with gnokey maketx call -send 100000000 ... instead of having to do 2 steps:

  1. Deploy realm with gnokey maketx addpkg ...
  2. Call it with gnokey maketx call -send 100000000 ...

@D4ryl00

This comment was marked as resolved.

@D4ryl00

This comment was marked as resolved.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 15:53
@Gno2D2 Gno2D2 added the review/triage-pending PRs opened by external contributors that are waiting for the 1st review label Feb 27, 2025
@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 force-pushed the chore/refactor-valopers branch from b07ae3c to 87b5649 Compare February 27, 2025 15:59
…link to r/demo/profile, and add questions for valopers.

Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
@D4ryl00 D4ryl00 force-pushed the chore/refactor-valopers branch from d4d9cbc to ab8ad02 Compare February 28, 2025 09:47
@zivkovicmilos zivkovicmilos requested review from zivkovicmilos and removed request for a team March 1, 2025 16:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🧾 package/realm Tag used for new Realms or Packages. review/triage-pending PRs opened by external contributors that are waiting for the 1st review
Projects
Status: Triage
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve r/gnoland/valopers to onboard new validators
3 participants