-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 210
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds icmp type and code to Cisco object-group output #300
Open
abates
wants to merge
1
commit into
google:master
Choose a base branch
from
abates:issue-298
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+60
−4
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -340,6 +340,23 @@ | |
action:: accept | ||
} | ||
""" | ||
GOOD_TERM_24 = """ | ||
term good_term_24 { | ||
protocol:: icmp | ||
source-address:: SOME_HOST | ||
icmp-type:: echo-reply | ||
action:: accept | ||
} | ||
""" | ||
GOOD_TERM_25 = """ | ||
term good_term_25 { | ||
protocol:: icmp | ||
source-address:: SOME_HOST | ||
icmp-type:: unreachable | ||
icmp-code:: 13 | ||
action:: accept | ||
} | ||
""" | ||
LONG_COMMENT_TERM = """ | ||
term long-comment-term { | ||
comment:: "%s " | ||
|
@@ -656,6 +673,21 @@ def testObjectGroup(self): | |
self.naming.GetNetAddr.assert_has_calls([mock.call('SOME_HOST'), | ||
mock.call('SOME_HOST')]) | ||
self.naming.GetServiceByProto.assert_called_once_with('HTTP', 'tcp') | ||
|
||
def testObjectGroupIcmp(self): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could you also please add a testcase for icmpv6 here, thanks! |
||
ip_grp = ['object-group network ipv4 SOME_HOST'] | ||
ip_grp.append(' 10.0.0.0/8') | ||
ip_grp.append('exit') | ||
|
||
self.naming.GetNetAddr.return_value = [ | ||
nacaddr.IP('10.0.0.0/8', token='SOME_HOST')] | ||
|
||
pol = policy.ParsePolicy( | ||
GOOD_OBJGRP_HEADER + GOOD_TERM_24 + GOOD_TERM_25, self.naming) | ||
acl = cisco.Cisco(pol, EXP_INFO) | ||
|
||
self.assertIn(' permit icmp net-group SOME_HOST any 0', str(acl)) | ||
self.assertIn(' permit icmp net-group SOME_HOST any 3 13', str(acl)) | ||
|
||
def testInet6(self): | ||
self.naming.GetNetAddr.return_value = [nacaddr.IP('10.0.0.0/8'), | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rather than looping here, making an explicit decision that this is for "icmp" handling only would make this correct, and readable.
In the case of icmp/icmpv6, this would handle it with the way you have, with self._TermletToStr(_ACTION_TABLE.get(str(
self.term.action[0])), proto, saddr, sport, daddr, dport, icmp_type, icmp_code)
Else, it would handle it the way it originally was.
self._TermletToStr(_ACTION_TABLE.get(str(
self.term.action[0])), proto, saddr, sport, daddr, dport))