-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 519
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug fixes for 1) over-counting instructions 2) broken functional sim #142
Open
SerinaTan
wants to merge
2
commits into
gpgpu-sim:dev
Choose a base branch
from
SerinaTan:dev
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, Serina - do you know what this if is testing for?
I know this is not your code - but your change effect code flows when this thing is true and I cannot tell from quick inspection what it is for.
Also, thanks for the fixes! :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the if-statement guards whether to perform functional simulation for each CTA. It is evaluated to true when any of the following is true: 1) not doing checkpoint
cp_op==0
2) checkpoint is on and we have reached the checkpoint kernel boundary, but we have not reached the CTA boundarycp_op==1 && cta_launched<cp_cta_resume && kernel.get_uid()==cp_kernel
3) we have not reached the checkpoint kernel boundarykernel.get_uid() < cp_kernel
. We need to callkernel.increment_cta_id()
so that the functional simulation can progress with an updated cta id (returned bykernel.get_next_cta_id_single()
).If this if-statement is off, we have reached the checkpoint boundary and we should halt functional simulation and transition into performance simulation. However, we still need to break the while loop by incrementing the kernel cta id (
kernel.increment_cta_id()
).That being said, I am actually not sure how this code EVER worked with checkpointing...