Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Chore] Fix asserts after upgrade to Tempo 2.7 #1112

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

IshwarKanse
Copy link
Contributor

@IshwarKanse IshwarKanse commented Feb 7, 2025

To be merged after #1110

--- PASS: chainsaw (2190.76s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/ossm-monolithic-otel (340.60s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/ossm-tempostack (316.83s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/ossm-tempostack-otel (340.18s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/otel-tempo-serverless (323.72s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/tempo-serverless (326.05s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monitoring (138.71s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monolithic-monitoring (80.77s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/red-metrics (323.91s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/gateway (45.00s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monolithic-s3-tls (101.65s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monolithic-memory (108.86s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/tls-singletenant-monolithic (126.23s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/custom-ca (130.45s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/compatibility (144.46s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/tls-singletenant (156.08s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monolithic-route (79.81s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/tempo-single-tenant-auth (133.56s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monolithic-multitenancy-static (86.83s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/tempostack-resources (197.92s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monolithic-single-tenant-auth (114.98s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/route (136.92s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/operator-metrics (23.53s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/multitenancy (155.25s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monolithic-multitenancy-openshift (79.96s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monolithic-extraconfig (53.19s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/reconcile (106.16s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monolithic-ingestion-mtls (79.86s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/generate (78.42s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/receivers-tls (165.06s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monolithic-receivers-tls (124.10s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/monolithic-pv (93.65s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/component-replicas (226.74s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/receivers-mtls (136.77s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/tempostack-extraconfig (409.83s)
    --- PASS: chainsaw/tempostack-retention-global (2884.89s)
PASS
Tests Summary...
- Passed  tests 35
- Failed  tests 0
- Skipped tests 0

@IshwarKanse IshwarKanse changed the title Fix asserts after upgrade to Tempo 2.7 [Chore] Fix asserts after upgrade to Tempo 2.7 Feb 7, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.60%. Comparing base (e7d851d) to head (2da63b4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1112   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   58.60%   58.60%           
=======================================
  Files         113      113           
  Lines       10160    10160           
=======================================
  Hits         5954     5954           
  Misses       3900     3900           
  Partials      306      306           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 58.60% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@IshwarKanse IshwarKanse mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2025
@andreasgerstmayr andreasgerstmayr merged commit 45d4a41 into grafana:main Feb 7, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants