Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Close conn on WriteResponse errors and add Nomad to CODEOWNERS #26

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

schmichael
Copy link
Member

Port the fix from hashicorp/net-rpc-msgpackrpc#15

For consistency only. To the best of my knowledge no HashiCorp tools use this code. They only use the serialization code from this package and all use hashicorp/net-rpc-msgpackrpc for RPC.

Also add @hashicorp/nomad-eng to CODEOWNERS as in hashicorp/go-sockaddr#75

Team will also need repo write access.

@schmichael schmichael requested a review from tgross February 7, 2025 22:36
@schmichael schmichael requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2025 22:36
Copy link
Member

@tgross tgross left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@tgross tgross merged commit 3655d07 into main Feb 20, 2025
4 checks passed
tgross added a commit to hashicorp/net-rpc-msgpackrpc that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
Update go-msgpack to pick up the bug fix described in
hashicorp/go-msgpack#26, which mirrors the work done
here in #15
tgross added a commit to hashicorp/net-rpc-msgpackrpc that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
Update go-msgpack to pick up the bug fix described in
hashicorp/go-msgpack#26, which mirrors the work done
here in #15

Also bump go version for CI to a supported version.
tgross added a commit to hashicorp/net-rpc-msgpackrpc that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
Update go-msgpack to pick up the bug fix described in
hashicorp/go-msgpack#26, which mirrors the work done
here in #15

Also bump go version for CI to a supported version.
@schmichael schmichael deleted the close-on-error branch February 24, 2025 18:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants