-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 594
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explain purpose of Kleisli Categories from the programmer's perspective #191
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -400,6 +400,23 @@ \section{Kleisli Categories} | |||
programs that in imperative languages are traditionally implemented | |||
using side effects. | |||
|
|||
But, what is the real purpose of this concept from the perspective of a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I partially agree with this statement because I believe the real purpose of this concept for programmers is a composition for a monadic functions.
e.g.(code is scala)
type Foo = Kleisli[IO, Int, String]
type Bar = Kleisli[IO, String, String]
can be easily composed like Bar compose Foo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If that is the case it would be good if you can add on upon the content I’ve written.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If that is the case it would be good if you can add on upon the content I’ve written.
Hi, I'll try to add a description tomorrow
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fortunately, I have time to write today:
But, what is the real purpose of this concept from the perspective of a programmer?
Since arrows in Kleisli category is monadic functions and we know from a category definition that arrows have to be composable inside a category.
So the Kleisli category just gives us a composition for monadic function.
Let's say we have to read text from a file and save it to a database.
We have 2 arrows:
type FileReader = String=> IO[String]
type DbWriter = String => IO[Unit]
It is not possible to compose them since FileReader returns IO[String] not String as DbWriter expects. So what can we do?
Just wrapped functions by Kleisli
type FileReaderKleisli = Kleisli[IO, String, String]
type DbWriterKleisli = Kleisli[IO, String, Unit]
and now we can easily compose them as DbWriterKleisli(DbWriter) compose FileReaderKleisli(FileReader)
All code is written in Scala(https://www.scala-lang.org/) and Kleisli type signature is taken from https://typelevel.org/cats/datatypes/kleisli.html
but I don't have time to change pull request directly.
@wongjiahau could you please add and correct if needed my text and add to your pull request?
0e79320
to
4986511
Compare
What is the status of this PR ? |
I feel like we need to include such explanation, because at my first read, I was left hanging about what is the purpose of Kleisli Categories.
After all, this book is meant for programmers, so I think it is very important to include such explanation.