This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
Improve table docs section #47
Open
Philogy
wants to merge
1
commit into
huff-language:main
Choose a base branch
from
Philogy:patch-1
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't think this works as intended- maybe something like this?
Also wondering if we should use tricks like
returndatasize
here- idea is to have easily readable (er, as easily readible as we can manage) code here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah my bad, replace
mstore
withcodecopy
in my example and it'll work (compiled and tested this time), your example would pad the return with 0-bytes but it works too.When it comes to tricks like
returndatasize
I feel like they should at least be in the docs somewhere but I agree that this might not be the best place. My thought was that if someone sees that and actually thinks to question it they'll learn as they research / ask about it.