Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

query job using job_id #240

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024
Merged

query job using job_id #240

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

vkghub
Copy link
Contributor

@vkghub vkghub commented Jul 9, 2024

Reference Ticket: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/187927423

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated job ID handling to improve consistency in BatchProcess operations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates in the code base primarily involve changing how the call method in Fdsh::Pvc::Dmf::Request::BatchProcess receives the job_id parameter and altering the way jobs are retrieved in the find_job method. These changes streamline the functionality and improve the reliability of job searches in the batch processing system.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/operations/fdsh/pvc/dmf/request/batch_process.rb Modified call method to take job_id as a direct parameter; adjusted find_job to use where instead of find.
spec/operations/fdsh/pvc/dmf/request/batch_process_spec.rb Changed the job identity parameter for calling BatchProcess to a specific string "dmf_request_1234".

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant BatchProcess
    participant TransmittableJob
    Caller->>BatchProcess: call({job_id: job_id, transactions_per_file: 5000})
    BatchProcess->>BatchProcess: find_job(job_id)
    BatchProcess->>TransmittableJob: where(job_id: job_id).last
    TransmittableJob-->>BatchProcess: job
    BatchProcess-->>Caller: process result
Loading

Poem

A rabbit sat down with code so neat,
Streamlined job retrieval, a tidy feat. 🐰
The job_id now passed clear and tight,
Enhanced the flow, a coder's delight.
In tests, the changes sure to glow,
Batch processing, on we go! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@vkghub vkghub self-assigned this Jul 9, 2024
@vkghub vkghub marked this pull request as ready for review July 9, 2024 13:26
@vkghub vkghub requested review from ymhari and TristanB17 July 9, 2024 13:27
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ee7167 and 8628de8.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/operations/fdsh/pvc/dmf/request/batch_process.rb (2 hunks)
  • spec/operations/fdsh/pvc/dmf/request/batch_process_spec.rb (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
spec/operations/fdsh/pvc/dmf/request/batch_process_spec.rb (1)

16-16: LGTM!

The change to pass a hardcoded job_id aligns with the updated method signature in the BatchProcess class.

app/operations/fdsh/pvc/dmf/request/batch_process.rb (2)

3-3: LGTM!

The update to the call method signature to take job_id directly as a parameter simplifies the method call and aligns with the updated logic.


53-53: LGTM! But verify the updated logic.

The update to use Transmittable::Job.where(job_id: job_id).last improves the job retrieval logic.

However, ensure that this change aligns with the overall logic and does not introduce any issues.

@ymhari ymhari enabled auto-merge (squash) July 9, 2024 13:32
@ymhari ymhari merged commit 5f466e2 into trunk Jul 9, 2024
5 checks passed
@ymhari ymhari deleted the pivotal_187927423 branch July 9, 2024 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants