-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
send success status in metadata header #253
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update involves enhancing the event publishing functionality in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/operations/fdsh/pvc/dmf/publish_events.rb (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
app/operations/fdsh/pvc/dmf/publish_events.rb (5)
Line range hint
12-20
:
LGTM!The
call
method is well-structured and uses monads for error handling.
Line range hint
22-36
:
LGTM!The
validate_input_params
method is well-structured and ensures that all required parameters are present and valid.
Line range hint
38-39
:
LGTM!The
encrypt_payload
method is concise and delegates the encryption task to an external operation.
Line range hint
51-57
:
LGTM!The
publish
method is well-structured and handles the result of the publish operation appropriately.
Line range hint
41-49
:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The addition of the
headers
parameter enhances the event metadata by including a status of "success".However, ensure that all function calls to
build_event
match the new signature.Verification successful
Ensure correct usage of
build_event
function inpublish_events.rb
.The search results show multiple
build_event
functions across various files. Focus on the function withinapp/operations/fdsh/pvc/dmf/publish_events.rb
to verify that its calls match the new signature.
app/operations/fdsh/pvc/dmf/publish_events.rb:
event = yield build_event(encrypted_payload, job_id, family_hbx_id)
This call matches the new signature with parameters
(encrypted_payload, job_id, family_hbx_id)
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `build_event` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type ruby -A 5 $'build_event'Length of output: 20314
Reference ticket: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/187973370
Summary by CodeRabbit