-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ignore management frames for a period after closing a connection #140
Merged
+14
−0
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
75253c8
added test to the case of receiving a ping frame after effectively cl…
HoneyryderChuck 3f0cf83
added a timespan of 15 seconds under which one can still receive fram…
HoneyryderChuck 445963b
changed spec description
HoneyryderChuck 9224cee
testing also other control frames
HoneyryderChuck File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall, what you wired up here makes sense. 👍
One question I have is.. Current logic will cover {settings, window_update, ping, goaway} connection management frames. What about other types of frames, do we need to do anything there? Per #139 (comment)...
Anything else / special we need to think about with respect to the above?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd say it's already covered here, here or here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough. One corner case here is that we'll be ignoring all frames, irrespective of their ID being established before or after GOAWAY is emitted, but that's probably OK. If that surfaces as an issue, we can revisit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is true, and I thought about that. One should throw protocol error for when a stream id is higher than the last stream id from the goaway frame. But I thought that was out of scope. Am I wrong?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's worth leaving a comment in the source, stating that we're not enforcing this behavior. I don't think we need to block this PR on implementing that though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
after reading better, I think I advised for something which is not RFC-compliant. I think this PR covers everything necessary.