/describe

[rocket13011]

Description

Suggested changelog entry

Related issues/external references

Fixes #

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • This change is only breaking for integrators, not for external standards or end-users.
• Documentation improvement

PR checklist

• I have checked there is no other PR open for the same change.
• I have read the Contribution Guidelines.
• I grant the project the right to include and distribute the code under the GNU.
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• I have verified that the code complies with the projects coding standards.
• [Required for new sniffs] I have added MD documentation for the sniff.

[rocket13011]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: php
• 📝 PR summary: This PR adds SMS functionality to the luna class in the core/class/luna.class.php file and makes some changes to the core/ajax/luna.ajax.php file. It also includes changes to the .github/workflows/pr_agent.yml file.
• 📌 Type of PR: New feature
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: False
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the changes are relatively small and focused, but require understanding of the existing code and the impact of the new SMS functionality.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: It would be helpful to provide more context in the PR description about the motivation behind adding SMS functionality and how it will be used in the application. Additionally, it would be good to include some tests to cover the new functionality.

🤖 Code feedback:

---

relevant file	core/ajax/luna.ajax.php
suggestion	Consider using named parameters in the luna::saveWifi method call for better readability. [medium]
relevant line	'+ ajax::success(luna::saveWifi(init('data'),init('interface')));'

---

relevant file	core/class/luna.class.php
suggestion	Add comments to explain the purpose and functionality of the new SMS-related methods. [medium]
relevant line	'+ /* ----- DEBUT SMS ----- */'

---

relevant file	core/class/luna.class.php
suggestion	Refactor the listSMS method to use a more efficient and readable approach, such as using regular expressions to extract the SMS IDs. [important]
relevant line	'+ public static function listSMS() {'

---

relevant file	.github/workflows/pr_agent.yml
suggestion	Remove the unnecessary permissions for issues, pull-requests, and contents in the pr_agent_job step. [medium]
relevant line	'+ permissions:\n+ issues: write\n+ pull-requests: write\n+ contents: write'

---

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the code feedback section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is: pr_commands = ["/review", ...] meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions. If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results. Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag) a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)

Extra sub-tools The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.