test: Enable Shanghai, Cancun and Prague EIPs test by Cancun and Prague forks

[ulbqb]

Proposed changes

This PR enables Shanghai, Cancun and Prague EIPs test by Cancun and Prague forks. This test uses [email protected] and prague-devnet-4. Version prague-devnet-4 contains only latest EIPs test of Prague so this uses latest major version and latest Prague version in combination.

core change:
This fixes to check if a called address is active precompiled contract during evm execution in test. This test needs precise check for active precompiled contracts.

skip tests:

• cancun/eip4788_beacon_root/* - This isn't supported yet.
• cancun/eip4844_blobs/* - This isn't supported yet.
• prague/eip7702_set_code_tx/* - This isn't supported yet.
• prague/eip2537_bls_12_381_precompiles/bls12_precompiles_before_fork/precompile_before_fork.json - This is check that old fork doesn't activate the precompiled contracts of EIP-2537. But Kaia recognizes 0x0a and 0x0b as precompiled contracts after Istanbul. This behavior results in the different consumed gas because two addresses are set in access list during tx preparation.

related: #152

Types of changes

Please put an x in the boxes related to your change.

• Bugfix
• New feature or enhancement
• Others

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING GUIDELINES doc
• I have read the CLA and signed by comment I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA in first time contribute
• Lint and unit tests pass locally with my changes ($ make test)
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Related issues

• Please leave the issue numbers or links related to this PR here.

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

[blukat29]

Thanks!