-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
delete export_genome_features_protein_to_fasta from spec and recompile #209
Conversation
@@ -236,9 +236,6 @@ module GenomeFileUtil { | |||
funcdef export_genome_as_gff(ExportParams params) | |||
returns (ExportOutput output) authentication required; | |||
|
|||
funcdef export_genome_features_protein_to_fasta(ExportParams params) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume no other model is using this function? We should probably mention this in RELEASE note.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They can't be, the return var is output
which is never initialized.
+1 on release notes though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated release notes 👍
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #209 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.61% 80.86% +0.24%
==========================================
Files 11 11
Lines 3007 2994 -13
==========================================
- Hits 2424 2421 -3
+ Misses 583 573 -10 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
kbase.yml
Outdated
0.11.7 | ||
0.11.8 | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
0.11.7 isn't registered anywhere, there's no need for a version bump
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Release notes still have a version bump
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so I just add under [0.11.7]? But how do I update the corresponding date?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yep. I'd just set the date to TBD for now then change it when you register
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
RELEASE_NOTES.md
Outdated
@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file. | |||
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/), | |||
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html). | |||
|
|||
## [0.11.8] - 2024-05-23 | |||
export_genome_features_protein_to_fasta was removed from GenomeFileUtil.spec |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
export_genome_features_protein_to_fasta was removed from GenomeFileUtil.spec | |
Unusable `export_genome_features_protein_to_fasta` function was removed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM but again @Tianhao-Gu should approve
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
No description provided.