Internal redux state structure refactor

[jitu5]

Description

Resolves #1969 (comment) point 2

To make React component options props consistent, Redux state structure is updated as below:

Current:

{
  visible: {
    code: false,
    exportBtn: true,
    exportModal: false,
    graph: true,
    labelBtn: true,
    layerBtn: true,
    metadataModal: false,
    miniMapBtn: true,
    modularPipelineFocusMode: null,
    expandPipelinesBtn: true,
    settingsModal: false,
    shareableUrlModal: false,
    sidebar: window.innerWidth > sidebarWidth.breakpoint,
  },
  display: {
    globalToolbar: true,
    sidebar: true,
    miniMap: true,
    expandAllPipelines: false,
  }
}

After this PR:

{
  visible: {
    code: false,
    exportModal: false,
    graph: true,
    metadataModal: false,
    miniMap: true,
    modularPipelineFocusMode: null,
    settingsModal: false,
    shareableUrlModal: false,
    sidebar: window.innerWidth > sidebarWidth.breakpoint,
  },
  display: {
    globalNavigation: true,
    sidebar: true,
    miniMap: true,
    expandPipelinesBtn: true,
    exportBtn: true,
    labelBtn: true,
    layerBtn: true,
  },
  expandAllPipelines: false,  
}

Development notes

• Move all props from visible to display which are buttons that can only be controlled by passing to react component
• Remove miniMapBtn from redux state
• Keep miniMap in both display and visible
• When display.miniMap is false both icon and miniMap will be hidden
• visible.miniMap will be used internally when used without react component to show/hide miniMap when clicked by user
• Move expandAllPipelines out of display and keep it same level as display
• pipelineBtn renamed to expandPipelinesBtn

###Note:
This PR is linked with #1982, #1969 and #1965

Checklist

• Read the contributing guidelines
• Opened this PR as a 'Draft Pull Request' if it is work-in-progress
• Updated the documentation to reflect the code changes
• Added new entries to the RELEASE.md file
• Added tests to cover my changes

[ravi-kumar-pilla]

Left a minor rename comment, but overall looks fine. Thank you @jitu5

[jitu5]

Closing this PR as it already merged with #1992 to main.