Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update vk #21

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

update vk #21

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lvjing2
Copy link
Contributor

@lvjing2 lvjing2 commented Nov 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated dependency to the latest pre-release version of virtual-kubelet, potentially introducing new features and bug fixes.
  • Refactor

    • Renamed callback function types in HttpTunnel and MqttTunnel to improve clarity and consistency.
    • Enhanced method receiver names for better context understanding.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No specific bug fixes were noted, but the updates may improve overall functionality and stability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request include an update to the go.mod file to reflect a new version of the github.com/koupleless/virtual-kubelet dependency. Additionally, modifications were made to the HttpTunnel and MqttTunnel structs in their respective files. These modifications primarily involve renaming callback function types and updating method signatures to align with a new naming scheme, enhancing code readability while maintaining the existing functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
go.mod Updated github.com/koupleless/virtual-kubelet dependency version from v0.3.4 to v0.3.5-0.20241114123757-27017ee5f1c0.
module_tunnels/koupleless_http_tunnel/http_tunnel.go Renamed callback types in HttpTunnel: OnNodeDiscovered to OnBaseDiscovered and OnNodeStatusDataArrived to OnBaseStatusArrived. Updated RegisterCallback method signature accordingly. No other logic changes.
module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go Renamed callback types in MqttTunnel: OnNodeDiscovered to OnBaseDiscovered and OnNodeStatusDataArrived to OnBaseStatusArrived. Updated method receiver names from m to mqttTunnel for clarity across multiple methods. No logic changes.

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where code does play,
A version updated, hip-hip-hooray!
Callbacks renamed, clarity in sight,
Http and Mqtt, shining so bright.
With each little change, our code does grow,
A rabbit's delight in the coding flow! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.58824% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.29%. Comparing base (1c07ba4) to head (a66509b).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...dule_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go 95.52% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #21   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.29%   81.29%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines        1834     1834           
=======================================
  Hits         1491     1491           
  Misses        287      287           
  Partials       56       56           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go (3)

Line range hint 273-280: Address TODO comments regarding PodKey assignment

There are commented-out PodKey assignments in both success handlers. This needs to be addressed to ensure proper pod key management.

Would you like me to help implement the PodKey assignment logic?

Also applies to: 282-289


301-306: Add error handling for JSON marshaling operations

The StartBiz and StopBiz methods don't check for JSON marshaling errors. While unlikely to fail for valid container objects, it's good practice to handle these errors.

Consider applying this pattern:

-	installBizRequestBytes, _ := json.Marshal(bizModel)
+	installBizRequestBytes, err := json.Marshal(bizModel)
+	if err != nil {
+		return fmt.Errorf("failed to marshal biz model: %w", err)
+	}

Also applies to: 309-314


293-294: Consider using QoS 1 for critical operations

Currently, all MQTT publish operations use QoS 0 (at most once delivery). While this is acceptable for health checks and status queries, consider using QoS 1 (at least once delivery) for critical operations like starting and stopping businesses to ensure message delivery.

Critical operations that should use QoS 1:

  • StartBiz (CommandInstallBiz)
  • StopBiz (CommandUnInstallBiz)

Also applies to: 297-298, 301-306, 309-314

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c07ba4 and a66509b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
  • module_tunnels/koupleless_http_tunnel/http_tunnel.go (2 hunks)
  • module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go (10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go

[warning] 49-49: module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go#L49
Added line #L49 was not covered by tests


[warning] 123-123: module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go#L123
Added line #L123 was not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (6)
go.mod (2)

12-12: Verify handling of breaking changes in callback names.

The update includes breaking changes in callback names (OnNodeDiscovered → OnBaseDiscovered, OnNodeStatusDataArrived → OnBaseStatusArrived). Ensure all usages are updated.

✅ Verification successful

The search results show that there are no occurrences of the old callback names (OnNodeDiscovered and OnNodeStatusDataArrived) in the codebase, while the new callback names (OnBaseDiscovered and OnBaseStatusArrived) are properly used in both MQTT and HTTP tunnel implementations. Let me generate the final response:

✅ Callback names are already updated correctly

The codebase shows no instances of the old callback names and correctly uses the new callback names (OnBaseDiscovered, OnBaseStatusArrived) in all relevant tunnel implementations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining uses of old callback names that need updating

# Search for old callback names
echo "Searching for old callback names that might need updating..."
rg "OnNodeDiscovered|OnNodeStatusDataArrived" -t go

# Search for new callback names to verify migration
echo "Verifying migration to new callback names..."
rg "OnBaseDiscovered|OnBaseStatusArrived" -t go

Length of output: 1333


12-12: Verify the use of pseudo-version instead of a stable release.

The dependency has been updated from a stable release v0.3.4 to a pseudo-version v0.3.5-0.20241114123757-27017ee5f1c0. While this allows tracking a specific commit, it's generally recommended to use stable releases in production unless there's a specific need for unreleased changes.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the usage of this dependency in the codebase to better understand the necessity of using this specific commit.


Use of pseudo-version is justified but requires careful testing

The dependency update to v0.3.5-0.20241114123757-27017ee5f1c0 is necessary as it contains critical fixes for data consistency and the codebase already implements the renamed callback functions (OnBaseDiscovered, OnBaseStatusArrived) in both HTTP and MQTT tunnels. Since the latest stable release is still v0.3.4 and these changes are required, using this specific commit is acceptable.

  • The commit fixes known pods data consistency issues
  • The callback function renames are properly implemented in:
    • module_tunnels/koupleless_http_tunnel/http_tunnel.go
    • module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the commit exists and check its changes

# Fetch the specific commit information
gh api repos/koupleless/virtual-kubelet/commits/27017ee5f1c0 --jq '.commit.message'

# Check if there's a newer stable release that includes these changes
gh api repos/koupleless/virtual-kubelet/releases --jq '.[0].tag_name'

Length of output: 193


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for direct imports of virtual-kubelet packages
rg "github.com/koupleless/virtual-kubelet" --type go -l

# Look for any references to the callback functions that were renamed
rg "OnNodeDiscovered|OnNodeStatusDataArrived|OnBaseDiscovered|OnBaseStatusArrived" --type go -A 2

Length of output: 2538

module_tunnels/koupleless_http_tunnel/http_tunnel.go (2)

41-42: LGTM! Callback field types updated consistently.

The callback field types have been updated from node-centric to base-centric naming, maintaining consistency with the virtual-kubelet dependency update.


95-95: LGTM! Method signature updated to match new types.

The RegisterCallback method signature has been updated to use the new base-centric callback types, aligning with the struct field changes.

Let's verify that all callers of RegisterCallback have been updated:

module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go (2)

36-40: LGTM! Improved naming convention for callback types

The renaming from Node to Base in callback types provides better clarity about their purpose and maintains consistency across the codebase.


49-49: Add test coverage for critical paths

The following code paths lack test coverage:

  1. GetBizUniqueKey method which is crucial for business identity
  2. Node reconnection logic in the MQTT connection handler

Consider adding test cases to verify:

  • Business identity generation with various container configurations
  • MQTT reconnection behavior with existing nodes

Would you like me to help generate test cases for these scenarios?

Also applies to: 122-123

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 49-49: module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go#L49
Added line #L49 was not covered by tests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant