-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update vk #21
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request include an update to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #21 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 81.29% 81.29%
=======================================
Files 12 12
Lines 1834 1834
=======================================
Hits 1491 1491
Misses 287 287
Partials 56 56 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go (3)
Line range hint
273-280
: Address TODO comments regarding PodKey assignmentThere are commented-out PodKey assignments in both success handlers. This needs to be addressed to ensure proper pod key management.
Would you like me to help implement the PodKey assignment logic?
Also applies to: 282-289
301-306
: Add error handling for JSON marshaling operationsThe
StartBiz
andStopBiz
methods don't check for JSON marshaling errors. While unlikely to fail for valid container objects, it's good practice to handle these errors.Consider applying this pattern:
- installBizRequestBytes, _ := json.Marshal(bizModel) + installBizRequestBytes, err := json.Marshal(bizModel) + if err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to marshal biz model: %w", err) + }Also applies to: 309-314
293-294
: Consider using QoS 1 for critical operationsCurrently, all MQTT publish operations use QoS 0 (at most once delivery). While this is acceptable for health checks and status queries, consider using QoS 1 (at least once delivery) for critical operations like starting and stopping businesses to ensure message delivery.
Critical operations that should use QoS 1:
- StartBiz (CommandInstallBiz)
- StopBiz (CommandUnInstallBiz)
Also applies to: 297-298, 301-306, 309-314
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
go.mod
(1 hunks)module_tunnels/koupleless_http_tunnel/http_tunnel.go
(2 hunks)module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go
(10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go
[warning] 49-49: module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go#L49
Added line #L49 was not covered by tests
[warning] 123-123: module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go#L123
Added line #L123 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (6)
go.mod (2)
12-12
: Verify handling of breaking changes in callback names.
The update includes breaking changes in callback names (OnNodeDiscovered → OnBaseDiscovered, OnNodeStatusDataArrived → OnBaseStatusArrived). Ensure all usages are updated.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that there are no occurrences of the old callback names (OnNodeDiscovered
and OnNodeStatusDataArrived
) in the codebase, while the new callback names (OnBaseDiscovered
and OnBaseStatusArrived
) are properly used in both MQTT and HTTP tunnel implementations. Let me generate the final response:
✅ Callback names are already updated correctly
The codebase shows no instances of the old callback names and correctly uses the new callback names (OnBaseDiscovered
, OnBaseStatusArrived
) in all relevant tunnel implementations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining uses of old callback names that need updating
# Search for old callback names
echo "Searching for old callback names that might need updating..."
rg "OnNodeDiscovered|OnNodeStatusDataArrived" -t go
# Search for new callback names to verify migration
echo "Verifying migration to new callback names..."
rg "OnBaseDiscovered|OnBaseStatusArrived" -t go
Length of output: 1333
12-12
: Verify the use of pseudo-version instead of a stable release.
The dependency has been updated from a stable release v0.3.4
to a pseudo-version v0.3.5-0.20241114123757-27017ee5f1c0
. While this allows tracking a specific commit, it's generally recommended to use stable releases in production unless there's a specific need for unreleased changes.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage of this dependency in the codebase to better understand the necessity of using this specific commit.
Use of pseudo-version is justified but requires careful testing
The dependency update to v0.3.5-0.20241114123757-27017ee5f1c0
is necessary as it contains critical fixes for data consistency and the codebase already implements the renamed callback functions (OnBaseDiscovered
, OnBaseStatusArrived
) in both HTTP and MQTT tunnels. Since the latest stable release is still v0.3.4 and these changes are required, using this specific commit is acceptable.
- The commit fixes known pods data consistency issues
- The callback function renames are properly implemented in:
module_tunnels/koupleless_http_tunnel/http_tunnel.go
module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the commit exists and check its changes
# Fetch the specific commit information
gh api repos/koupleless/virtual-kubelet/commits/27017ee5f1c0 --jq '.commit.message'
# Check if there's a newer stable release that includes these changes
gh api repos/koupleless/virtual-kubelet/releases --jq '.[0].tag_name'
Length of output: 193
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for direct imports of virtual-kubelet packages
rg "github.com/koupleless/virtual-kubelet" --type go -l
# Look for any references to the callback functions that were renamed
rg "OnNodeDiscovered|OnNodeStatusDataArrived|OnBaseDiscovered|OnBaseStatusArrived" --type go -A 2
Length of output: 2538
module_tunnels/koupleless_http_tunnel/http_tunnel.go (2)
41-42
: LGTM! Callback field types updated consistently.
The callback field types have been updated from node-centric to base-centric naming, maintaining consistency with the virtual-kubelet dependency update.
95-95
: LGTM! Method signature updated to match new types.
The RegisterCallback method signature has been updated to use the new base-centric callback types, aligning with the struct field changes.
Let's verify that all callers of RegisterCallback have been updated:
module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go (2)
36-40
: LGTM! Improved naming convention for callback types
The renaming from Node
to Base
in callback types provides better clarity about their purpose and maintains consistency across the codebase.
49-49
: Add test coverage for critical paths
The following code paths lack test coverage:
GetBizUniqueKey
method which is crucial for business identity- Node reconnection logic in the MQTT connection handler
Consider adding test cases to verify:
- Business identity generation with various container configurations
- MQTT reconnection behavior with existing nodes
Would you like me to help generate test cases for these scenarios?
Also applies to: 122-123
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 49-49: module_tunnels/koupleless_mqtt_tunnel/mqtt_tunnel.go#L49
Added line #L49 was not covered by tests
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
virtual-kubelet
, potentially introducing new features and bug fixes.Refactor
HttpTunnel
andMqttTunnel
to improve clarity and consistency.Bug Fixes