Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

to 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT #205

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

to 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT #205

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gaosaroma
Copy link
Contributor

@gaosaroma gaosaroma commented Nov 8, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected a typo in the GPG plugin property for improved build process accuracy.
  • Chores

    • Updated the versioning of dependencies to the new snapshot version for better compatibility and access to the latest features.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request primarily updates the pom.xml file by changing the <revision> property from 1.3.2 to 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT, affecting the versioning of several dependencies. Additionally, a typo in the property name for the GPG plugin was corrected from maven.gpg.pluign to maven.gpg.plugin. No other structural changes were made to the POM file.

Changes

File Change Summary
pom.xml - Updated <revision> from 1.3.2 to 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT.
- Corrected typo from maven.gpg.pluign to maven.gpg.plugin.

Possibly related PRs

🐇 In the garden where we play,
A version change has come our way.
From 1.3.2 to 1.3.3,
A snapshot now, oh what glee!
With a typo fixed, we hop and cheer,
For every change brings us near! 🌱


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pom.xml (1)

Line range hint 27-27: Fix typo in maven.gpg.plugin property name

The property maven.gpg.pluign contains a typo (should be plugin instead of pluign). This property is referenced in the GPG plugin configuration in both release and snapshot profiles.

Apply this diff to fix the typo:

-        <maven.gpg.pluign>1.6</maven.gpg.pluign>
+        <maven.gpg.plugin>1.6</maven.gpg.plugin>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a34b4fe and ca5890a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pom.xml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pom.xml (1)

12-12: LGTM on version update to 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT

The version update is consistent with the PR title and affects multiple dependencies using ${revision}. This change indicates the project is moving to a development/testing phase.

Let's verify all dependencies using the revision property:

✅ Verification successful

Version update to 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT is properly propagated

The version update is correctly referenced across all dependent modules through the ${revision} property. The change affects:

  • Core modules: arklet-core, arklet-springboot-starter
  • Base components: koupleless-common, koupleless-base-starter, koupleless-base-plugin
  • Extension modules: koupleless-ext and its submodules
  • Build tools and loaders
  • All parent-child POM relationships
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all dependencies using ${revision} to ensure consistent versioning
rg -l "\${revision}"

Length of output: 117


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all dependencies using ${revision} by escaping the special characters
rg -l '\$\{revision\}'

Length of output: 1065


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual version references in these files
rg '\$\{revision\}' -B1 -A1

Length of output: 10328

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.83%. Comparing base (a34b4fe) to head (ca5890a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #205   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     75.83%   75.83%           
  Complexity      189      189           
=========================================
  Files            90       90           
  Lines          2392     2392           
  Branches        259      259           
=========================================
  Hits           1814     1814           
  Misses          448      448           
  Partials        130      130           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@inrandom inrandom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@lvjing2 lvjing2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants