Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(operator): fetch cluster name from providers #1881

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rootxrishabh
Copy link
Member

Purpose of PR?:

This PR adds fetching cluster name from cluster providers.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
If the changes in this PR are manually verified, list down the scenarios covered::

Additional information for reviewer? :
Mention if this PR is part of any design or a continuation of previous PRs

Checklist:

  • Bug fix. Fixes #
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • PR Title follows the convention of <type>(<scope>): <subject>
  • Commit has unit tests
  • Commit has integration tests

Signed-off-by: Rishabh Soni <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@Prateeknandle Prateeknandle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what happens in case there is no operator, should we have a fallback logic in kubearmor?
cc: @daemon1024

Signed-off-by: Rishabh Soni <[email protected]>
@rootxrishabh
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, cluster name goes to "default".

@Prateeknandle
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, cluster name goes to "default".

@rootxrishabh i meant shouldn't we fetch cluster name from providers in case operator is not there?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants