Removing Alona, cwilkers, & jobbler from reviewer/approver

[aburdenthehand]

Sadly @AlonaKaplan @cwilkers and @jobbler are no longer active in the project. It has been a bit over 6 months since their last contribution and we should remove them from our reviewer/approver list.

Thank you for your past contributions, and for your help in making this project what it is today.

(Also minor housekeeping: moving jed to alphabetical order)

Release note:

NONE

[kubevirt-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from aburdenthehand. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jean-edouard]

/cc @AlonaKaplan @cwilkers @jobbler
Please take a second to LGTM if you see this

[EdDev]

@dhiller had a script that does this, it will be cleaner if we use it to do this type of actions.

[aburdenthehand]

@EdDev I am okay with a script handling this in the future however to the best of my knowledge the only script we have today targets members in the org after 12 months of inactivity and removes them. I'm not sure if a person removed from the org would affect their being tagged as a reviewer based on these owners files.

[EdDev]

@EdDev I am okay with a script handling this in the future however to the best of my knowledge the only script we have today targets members in the org after 12 months of inactivity and removes them. I'm not sure if a person removed from the org would affect their being tagged as a reviewer based on these owners files.

I think it removed them from the org, based on the CNCF policy of inactivity.

If we remove specific members, we need to mention what policy exactly we follow, how we detect these members and what are the steps needed to politely retire them.

But if there is an agreement on all of the details, don't let me be in the way.

[aburdenthehand]

This doesn't remove them from the org, just as reviewers and approvers with special privileges. They will presumably be removed after 12 months of inactivity but at the moment they are inactive in the community and being tagged on reviews which limits visibility on issues/prs.
I'm using the same criteria that we apply for project maintainers but I agree that it would be worth being explicit about how we remove inactive reviewers and approvers in the future. Looking through the history of this file it seems as though there is a general agreement that when someone leaves the project they are removed from these roles.