Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Quality of Life improvements for Astra Component #6953

Open
wants to merge 38 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

deon-sanchez
Copy link
Collaborator

@deon-sanchez deon-sanchez commented Mar 6, 2025

This pull request includes several changes to improve the handling of helper texts, embedding provider options, and database information in the astradb.py file, as well as updates to the frontend components to support these backend changes.

Backend changes:

Frontend changes:

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 6, 2025
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 6, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #6953 will improve performances by 28.44%

Comparing lfoss-683-1 (65f295b) with main (a8f4090)

Summary

⚡ 1 improvements
✅ 18 untouched benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
test_cancel_nonexistent_build 13.6 ms 10.6 ms +28.44%

deon-sanchez and others added 12 commits March 6, 2025 15:24
- Improved AstraDB component's embedding provider link with better accessibility attributes
- Updated Vector Store RAG starter project JSON with formatted configuration
- Refined UI text and link presentation for better user experience
- Implemented visual indicator (*) for required node parameters
- Updated custom parameter title rendering to show required status
- Enhanced UI to provide clearer input requirements
…langflow into lfoss-683-1"

This reverts commit 2eb0fcb, reversing
changes made to 9ea44ac.
@deon-sanchez deon-sanchez changed the title Lfoss 683 1 feat: Quality of Life improvements for Astra Component Mar 10, 2025
@deon-sanchez deon-sanchez self-assigned this Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 10, 2025
@dosubot dosubot bot added size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants