Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "removed unused linagora.esn.james module from inbox" #457

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2021

Conversation

rezk2ll
Copy link
Member

@rezk2ll rezk2ll commented May 25, 2021

Reverts #455

it seems the admin SPA can't build without it. so we might need to copy the james stuff in the admin SPA first.

or move it here https://github.com/linagora/esn-frontend-inbox-james

@tanandy
Copy link
Contributor

tanandy commented May 25, 2021

can you fix admin spa ? we dont need to revert then if it works in inbox

@fabienmoyon
Copy link
Member

we revert it and we will move what we don't need in to the inbox-james for the admin SPA

@tanandy
Copy link
Contributor

tanandy commented May 25, 2021

but this is not the spa admin. Do we need to keep james stuff inside inbox ?

@rezk2ll
Copy link
Member Author

rezk2ll commented May 25, 2021

@atan-linagora for now let's revert it.
i copied both, esn-frontend-inbox-james and linagora.esn.james in admin and integrated them but the admin SPA still requires stuff from inbox esn.inbox.libs without requiring it in the package.json ( it relies on esn-frontend-inbox-james to install it which is bad )
so I suggest we just merge this revert PR and fix the admin potential problems and worry about the mess we have with dependencies later.

Copy link
Contributor

@tanandy tanandy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@tanandy tanandy merged commit 0838b8f into main May 25, 2021
@tanandy tanandy deleted the revert-455-#452 branch May 25, 2021 14:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants