Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency coverage to v5.5 #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 28, 2022

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
coverage ==5.0.3 -> ==5.5 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

nedbat/coveragepy (coverage)

v5.5

Compare Source

  • coverage combine has a new option, --keep to keep the original data
    files after combining them. The default is still to delete the files after
    they have been combined. This was requested in issue 1108_ and implemented
    in pull request 1110_. Thanks, Éric Larivière.

  • When reporting missing branches in coverage report, branches aren't
    reported that jump to missing lines. This adds to the long-standing behavior
    of not reporting branches from missing lines. Now branches are only reported
    if both the source and destination lines are executed. Closes both issue 1065_ and issue 955_.

  • Minor improvements to the HTML report:

    • The state of the line visibility selector buttons is saved in local storage
      so you don't have to fiddle with them so often, fixing issue 1123_.

    • It has a little more room for line numbers so that 4-digit numbers work
      well, fixing issue 1124_.

  • Improved the error message when combining line and branch data, so that users
    will be more likely to understand what's happening, closing issue 803_.

.. _issue 803:https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/8033
.. _issue 955https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/95555
.. _issue 106https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1065065
.. _issue 11https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/11081108
.. _pull request 1https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/1110/1110
.. _issue https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1123s/1123
.. _issuehttps://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1124es/1124

.. _changes_54:

v5.4

Compare Source

  • If you attempt to combine statement coverage data with branch coverage data,
    coverage.py used to fail with the message "Can't combine arc data with line
    data" or its reverse, "Can't combine line data with arc data." These
    messages used internal terminology, making it hard for people to understand
    the problem. They are now changed to mention "branch coverage data" and
    "statement coverage data."

  • Fixed a minor branch coverage problem with wildcard match/case cases using
    names or guard clauses.

  • Started testing on 3.13 free-threading (nogil) builds of Python. I'm not
    claiming full support yet. Closes issue 1799_.

.. _issue 1799:https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/17999

.. _changes_7-5-3:

v5.3.1

Compare Source

  • When using --source on a large source tree, v5.x was slower than previous
    versions. This performance regression is now fixed, closing issue 1037_.

  • Mysterious SQLite errors can happen on PyPy, as reported in issue 1010_. An
    immediate retry seems to fix the problem, although it is an unsatisfying
    solution.

  • The HTML report now saves the sort order in a more widely supported way,
    fixing issue 986. Thanks, Sebastián Ramírez (pull request 1066).

  • The HTML report pages now have a :ref:Sleepy Snake <sleepy> favicon.

  • Wheels are now provided for manylinux2010, and for PyPy3 (pp36 and pp37).

  • Continuous integration has moved from Travis and AppVeyor to GitHub Actions.

.. _issue 986:https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/9866
.. _issue 1037https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/103737
.. _issue 101https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1010010
.. _pull request 10https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/10661066

.. _changes_53:

v5.3

Compare Source

  • Performance improvements for combining data files, especially when measuring
    line coverage. A few different quadratic behaviors were eliminated. In one
    extreme case of combining 700+ data files, the time dropped from more than
    three hours to seven minutes. Thanks for Kraken Tech for funding the fix.

  • Performance improvements for generating HTML reports, with a side benefit of
    reducing memory use, closing issue 1791_. Thanks to Daniel Diniz for
    helping to diagnose the problem.

.. _issue 1791:https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/17911

.. _changes_7-5-2:

v5.2.1: 5.2.1

Compare Source

Version 5.2.1 — 2020-07-23

  • The dark mode HTML report still used light colors for the context listing, making them unreadable (issue 1009). This is now fixed.
  • The time stamp on the HTML report now includes the time zone. Thanks, Xie Yanbo (pull request 960).

➡️  PyPI page: coverage 5.2.1.
➡️  To install: python3 -m pip install coverage==5.2.1

v5.2

Compare Source

  • Fix: nested matches of exclude patterns could exclude too much code, as
    reported in issue 1779_. This is now fixed.

  • Changed: previously, coverage.py would consider a module docstring to be an
    executable statement if it appeared after line 1 in the file, but not
    executable if it was the first line. Now module docstrings are never counted
    as executable statements. This can change coverage.py's count of the number
    of statements in a file, which can slightly change the coverage percentage
    reported.

  • In the HTML report, the filter term and "hide covered" checkbox settings are
    remembered between viewings, thanks to Daniel Diniz <pull 1776_>_.

  • Python 3.13.0b1 is supported.

  • Fix: parsing error handling is improved to ensure bizarre source files are
    handled gracefully, and to unblock oss-fuzz fuzzing, thanks to Liam DeVoe <pull 1788_>. Closes issue 1787.

.. _pull 1776:https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/17766
.. _issue 1779https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/177979
.. _issue 178https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1787787
.. _pull 17https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/17881788

.. _changes_7-5-1:

v5.1

Compare Source

  • Fix: a pragma comment on the continuation lines of a multi-line statement
    now excludes the statement and its body, the same as if the pragma is
    on the first line. This closes issue 754. The fix was contributed by
    Daniel Diniz <pull 1773_>
    .

  • Fix: very complex source files like this one <resolvent_lookup_>_ could
    cause a maximum recursion error when creating an HTML report. This is now
    fixed, closing issue 1774_.

  • HTML report improvements:

    • Support files (JavaScript and CSS) referenced by the HTML report now have
      hashes added to their names to ensure updated files are used instead of
      stale cached copies.

    • Missing branch coverage explanations that said "the condition was never
      false" now read "the condition was always true" because it's easier to
      understand.

    • Column sort order is remembered better as you move between the index pages,
      fixing issue 1766. Thanks, Daniel Diniz <pull 1768_>.

.. _resolvent_lookup: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/130950f3e6b3f97fcc17f4599ac08f70fdd2e9d4/sympy/polys/numberfields/resolvent_lookup.py
.. _issue 754https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/75454
.. _issue 176https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1766766
.. _pull 17https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/17681768
.. _pull 1https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/pull/1773/1773
.. _issue https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1774s/1774

.. _changes_7-5-0:

v5.0.4: 5.0.4

Compare Source

Version 5.0.4 — 2020-03-16

  • If using the [run] relative_files setting, the XML report will use relative files in the <source> elements indicating the location of source code. Closes issue 948.
  • The textual summary report could report missing lines with negative line numbers on PyPy3 7.1 (issue 943). This is now fixed.
  • Windows wheels for Python 3.8 were incorrectly built, but are now fixed. (issue 949)
  • Updated Python 3.9 support to 3.9a4.
  • HTML reports couldn’t be sorted if localStorage wasn’t available. This is now fixed: sorting works even though the sorting setting isn’t retained. (issue 944 and pull request 945). Thanks, Abdeali Kothari.

➡️  PyPI page: coverage 5.0.4.
➡️  To install: python3 -m pip install coverage==5.0.4


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the renovate label Dec 28, 2022
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency coverage to v5.5 Update dependency coverage to v5.5 - autoclosed Apr 4, 2023
@renovate renovate bot closed this Apr 4, 2023
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/coverage-5.x branch April 4, 2023 02:01
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency coverage to v5.5 - autoclosed Update dependency coverage to v5.5 Apr 6, 2023
@renovate renovate bot reopened this Apr 6, 2023
@renovate renovate bot restored the renovate/coverage-5.x branch April 6, 2023 13:23
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency coverage to v5.5 Update dependency coverage to v5.5 - autoclosed Feb 23, 2025
@renovate renovate bot closed this Feb 23, 2025
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/coverage-5.x branch February 23, 2025 07:10
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency coverage to v5.5 - autoclosed Update dependency coverage to v5.5 Feb 25, 2025
@renovate renovate bot reopened this Feb 25, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/coverage-5.x branch from 4a4d3a6 to 86d8d2e Compare February 25, 2025 04:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants