[rules] Rename and change semantiv of extra_bazel_features
#26068
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
extra_bazel_features
attribute was added #25840 as an attribute torv_rule
to transitively add features to the rule. However this is too general because when applied to opentitan_binary, it will change the features not only for the rule, but all its dependencies such as exec_env, tools, etc which may have unintended effects.This commit keeps essentially the same logic but instead of applying it to
rv_rule
, it is now only an attribute ofopentitan_binary
andopentitan_test
and it transitions only features for thedeps
. This attribute is also renamed totransitive_features
. The rationale for the rename is that every bazel rule has an implicitfeatures
argument but it only applies to the target, not its dependencies. This attribute does the same but also applies transitively.