Any interest in EditorSettings?

[singalen]

I honestly see no real point, but maybe you want it for functional completeness. If not, I'll close this PR.

I needed to read the chunk size, but I don't think EditorSettings is an authoritative source.

[bjorn]

I needed to read the chunk size, but I don't think EditorSettings is an authoritative source.

Yeah, at the moment it is, but it's not very nice to rely on this. Personally I think rs-tiled should use a chunk size that is independent of the stored files. See also #125 (review).

[bjorn]

I guess alternatively, if we recognize the idea of dynamic chunk sizes is just a bad idea, then the implication is that storing the size on each chunk was unnecessary, and we could introduce attributes outside of the editorsettings that store the size and get rid of the width and height attributes on each chunk element. I think we should then also store the chunk coordinates in chunks rather than tiles. The main problem with this, of course, is the breaking of compatibility.

[bjorn]

Stored chunk sizes are no longer relevant now that #157 was merged. Editor settings might be relevant in the future, but likely only once we would start work on #171, so closing this for now.