Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: make sure that metadata is not deleted when schemas are calculat… #815

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

marcosschroh
Copy link
Owner

…ed more than once. Closes #799

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2024

PR Preview Action v1.4.8
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2024-12-06 17:49 UTC

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.48%. Comparing base (90e487b) to head (e3fa811).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #815   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.48%   99.48%           
=======================================
  Files          35       35           
  Lines        2130     2131    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         2119     2120    +1     
  Misses         11       11           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@marcosschroh marcosschroh merged commit 93f4198 into master Dec 6, 2024
9 checks passed
@marcosschroh marcosschroh deleted the fix/excluede-fields-ignore-in-second-time branch December 6, 2024 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

exclude_default is ignored on Pydantic model from the second call
1 participant