-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
Conversation
We need a better user permission system for this. @maltezacharias is on it |
Well, we should open another issue for this, right? I can easily add another group of 'statsviewers', what is @maltezacharias onto? 😅 |
Yes, he opened #466. Shouldn't prevent merging this PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you leave out "Deactivated Institutions" on purpose?
I did not know they could deactivate themselves. I can add it if required. |
Now I'm not sure either. Isn’t that part of the basic user functionality? If it's not, why can’t they deactivate themselves if they found someone for now but need more help later? Can’t test it locally right now. |
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Bischoff <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Bischoff <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Bischoff <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Bischoff <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise it's fine
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Bischoff <[email protected]>
thank youuu :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nooooooooo :D
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ class DataBaseStats: | |||
stat_count = RegisterList() | |||
stat_list = RegisterList() | |||
|
|||
# TODO: last X days? | |||
# TODO: last X days? # noqa: T003 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not the idea @Baschdl 😆
Either its an idea that isn't worth pursuing, or it is a TODO and should get its own issue for keeping track of it :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a PO issue where we just have to wait for input from the rest. Not sure if opening an issue for all TODOs is a good idea. I fear that the issues will get completely messy
@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ def deactivated_accounts(self): | |||
Student.objects.filter(is_activated=False).count(), | |||
) | |||
|
|||
# TODO: helfende pro bundesland und großstadt | |||
# TODO: helfende pro bundesland und großstadt. Requires | |||
# https://github.com/match4everyone/match4healthcare/issues/492 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here, the issue is supposed to be about the TODO itself. In this way, nobody will ever check this again. If they were linked on github, one could see more easily whether the dependency issue is closed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can reference this as dependent
in 492 but I wouldn't open a separate issue
First version of #271