Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: add Document Models / emmet tutorial #917

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

rkingsbury
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Adds the tutorial "An introduction to task documents, schemas, and emmet" as requested in #750 . Thanks to @abhardwaj73 for contributing the TaskDoc output which is included.

I've tried to be comprehensive about the key points of a "typical" task doc structure, but I'm sure there are some things I've misstated, so @utf and others please feel free to request edits/changes.

In case it's difficult to preview the built documentation with my changes, I am attaching a .pdf of my locally built version.
An introduction to task documents, schemas, and emmet - atomate2.pdf

@utf
Copy link
Member

utf commented Jul 18, 2024

This looks fantastic, thanks @rkingsbury

@utf utf merged commit 7fa53f5 into materialsproject:main Jul 18, 2024
6 checks passed
@rkingsbury
Copy link
Contributor Author

rkingsbury commented Jul 19, 2024

Thanks @utf . I just realized that I didn't add a link to this tutorial from the navigation menu, so it's only visible if you search for it. I'll try to correct soon but wanted to make you aware in case you're working on other documentation updates.

The link is https://materialsproject.github.io/atomate2/user/docs_schemas_emmet.html

BryantLi-BLI pushed a commit to BryantLi-BLI/atomate2 that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2024
@utf utf added the docs Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants