-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
server-server-api: Fix grammar #1665
Conversation
content/server-server-api.md
Outdated
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ to send. The process overall is as follows: | |||
for `<hostname>`. | |||
|
|||
6. If the `/.well-known` request returned an error response, and the | |||
SRV record was not found, an IP address is resolved using CNAME, AAAA and A | |||
SRV records were not found, an IP address is resolved using CNAME, AAAA and A |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't matrix set up in a way where there is only one SRV record at any given time? (Though on a quick search I didn't see anything not allowing multiple)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Standard SRV resolution allows for multiple records, and Matrix never forbade it. But also, steps 4 and 5 refer to different SRV records (_matrix-fed._tcp.<hostname>
and _matrix._tcp.<hostname>
), so it really should be plural.
On the other hand "the SRV records were not found" sounds like SRV records exist but could not be found for whatever reason. So maybe something like "... and no SRV records are present ...", or "... and no SRV records are found ..." might be better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Preview: https://pr1665--matrix-spec-previews.netlify.app