You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking the content over, I get the impression the material (mainly the RSE section) is more of a reference, but not really for a course. In a reference, I expect these types of headings to quickly look through to find what I want... sorta like an FAQ. But for a course, I expect much more "this is something, here is an exercise to test if you understand it". Very much related to #226 and #240, and was initially described at #44. I feel at this point we have too much content, and what we need is more exercises, live coding, and challenges, and much more practical (rather than theoretical concepts).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Today we discussed to edit RSE so that there is a coherent narrative and data sets throughout. In the discussion we also mentioned that it should be written more as a text book than a reference book so this issue could also be covered under that umbrella since it is related. Let's discuss and clarify at the next meeting
Looking the content over, I get the impression the material (mainly the RSE section) is more of a reference, but not really for a course. In a reference, I expect these types of headings to quickly look through to find what I want... sorta like an FAQ. But for a course, I expect much more "this is something, here is an exercise to test if you understand it". Very much related to #226 and #240, and was initially described at #44. I feel at this point we have too much content, and what we need is more exercises, live coding, and challenges, and much more practical (rather than theoretical concepts).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: