Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

http-client-java, support client parameter to client #4415

Conversation

weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Contributor

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft commented Sep 12, 2024

This is only part of the support for Azure/autorest.java#2428

cadl-ranch Azure/cadl-ranch#727

user code

        InitializationClient client = new InitializationClientBuilder()
            .name("client1")
            .buildClient();
        client.action();

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the emitter:client:java Issue for the Java client emitter: @typespec/http-client-java label Sep 12, 2024
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

No changes needing a change description found.

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

You can try these changes here

🛝 Playground 🌐 Website 📚 Next docs

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit deae32e Sep 12, 2024
25 checks passed
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft deleted the http-client-java_client-parameter branch September 12, 2024 08:37
sarangan12 pushed a commit to sarangan12/typespec that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
This is only part of the support for
Azure/autorest.java#2428

cadl-ranch Azure/cadl-ranch#727

user code
```java
        InitializationClient client = new InitializationClientBuilder()
            .name("client1")
            .buildClient();
        client.action();
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
emitter:client:java Issue for the Java client emitter: @typespec/http-client-java
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants