Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Octopoes combined schedulers integration #4016

Conversation

jpbruinsslot
Copy link
Contributor

@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot commented Jan 8, 2025

Changes

Main PR: #3839

Issue link

Closes #3838

@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot self-assigned this Jan 8, 2025
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 8, 2025 11:23
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot changed the base branch from main to poc/mula/combined-schedulers January 8, 2025 11:23
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot added the octopoes Issues related to octopoes label Jan 8, 2025
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot requested a review from Donnype January 8, 2025 14:32
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ class ScanProfileMutation(BaseModel):
operation: OperationType
primary_key: str
value: AbstractOOI | None = None
client_id: str
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I named this client_id since organisations are referred to as clients in octopoes. So not sure if this should be organisation or client

Copy link
Contributor

@Donnype Donnype left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👌

@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot merged commit 03b75f7 into poc/mula/combined-schedulers Jan 9, 2025
22 of 27 checks passed
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot deleted the feat/octopoes/combined-schedulers-integration branch January 9, 2025 09:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
octopoes Issues related to octopoes
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants