Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

New PipeOpEncodePL for Piecewise Linear Encoding #861

Draft
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

New PipeOpEncodePL for Piecewise Linear Encoding #861

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

advieser
Copy link
Collaborator

closes #813

advieser
advieser commented Dec 21, 2024
View reviewed changes
R/PipeOpEncodePL.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
advieser
advieser commented Dec 21, 2024
View reviewed changes
R/PipeOpEncodePL.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@advieser
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Consider whether we need to specify .additional_phash_input in tree pipeop.

@advieser
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fix column naming. Currently, column names are duplicated, with this behavior being introduced through the helper function.

@advieser
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Check numsplits behavior and interpretation.

@advieser
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fix column naming. Currently, column names are duplicated, with this behavior being introduced through the helper function.

imap() sets names. Also try out imap_dtc().

@advieser
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Do we want to add a public method to retrieve the learner?

@advieser advieser mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

regression tree based binning of cts features
1 participant
@advieser