⬆️ 🛠️(deps): update dependency ruff to ^0.9.0 #2044
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![renovate[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/2740?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR updates the ruff dependency from ^0.8.0 to ^0.9.0. This update introduces the 2025 style guide for formatting, stabilizes several rules and behaviors, adds preview features, changes some rules, improves the server and CLI, and fixes various bugs. State diagram for Ruff version transitionstateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Ruff_0.8.0
Ruff_0.8.0 --> Ruff_0.9.0: Update
state Ruff_0.8.0 {
[*] --> Old_Style
Old_Style --> [*]
}
state Ruff_0.9.0 {
[*] --> Style_2025
Style_2025: 2025 Style Guide
Style_2025: Stabilized Rules
Style_2025: New Preview Features
Style_2025 --> [*]
}
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:
- It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, renovate[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!
- We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 Core Changes
- Primary purpose and scope: Update the
ruffdependency to version^0.9.0. - Key components modified:
pyproject.toml - Cross-component impacts: None
- Business value alignment: Ensures the codebase is up-to-date with the latest linting and formatting rules, which can improve code quality and maintainability.
1.2 Technical Architecture
- System design modifications: None
- Component interaction changes: None
- Integration points impact: None
- Dependency changes and implications: Updating
ruffto^0.9.0introduces new formatting rules and stabilizes several existing rules, which may affect the code formatting and linting results.
2. Deep Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Analysis
pyproject.toml - [tool.poetry.group.dev.dependencies]
- Submitted PR Code:
[tool.poetry.group.dev.dependencies]
python-semantic-release = ">=8.0.8"
-ruff = "^0.8.0"
+ruff = "^0.9.0"
pre-commit = "^4.0.0"-
Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The update to
ruffversion^0.9.0introduces new formatting rules and stabilizes several existing rules. This may result in different formatting and linting outputs, which could affect the codebase. - Edge cases and error handling: The new formatting rules might introduce edge cases where the code is formatted differently than expected. This could lead to inconsistencies in the codebase.
- Cross-component impact: None
- Business logic considerations: None
- Current logic and potential issues: The update to
-
LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None
-
Improvement rationale: None
2.2 Implementation Quality
-
Code Structure:
- Organization and modularity: The change is isolated to the
pyproject.tomlfile, which is appropriate for a dependency update. - Design pattern adherence: N/A
- Reusability aspects: N/A
- Maintainability factors: Updating dependencies regularly helps maintain the codebase and ensures compatibility with the latest tools and libraries.
- Organization and modularity: The change is isolated to the
-
Error Handling:
- Exception scenarios coverage: N/A
- Recovery mechanisms: N/A
- Logging and monitoring: N/A
- User experience impact: Developers may need to adapt to the new formatting rules introduced by
ruffversion^0.9.0.
-
Performance Considerations:
- Resource utilization: N/A
- Scalability aspects: N/A
- Bottleneck analysis: N/A
- Optimization opportunities: N/A
3. Risk Assessment
3.1 Critical Issues
🔴 P0 (Must Fix):
- Issue: Potential formatting inconsistencies due to new rules in
ruffversion^0.9.0. - Impact:
- Technical implications: The codebase may be reformatted in a way that differs from the current style, leading to inconsistencies.
- Business consequences: Developers may need to spend time adjusting to the new formatting rules.
- User experience effects: None
- Resolution:
- Specific code changes: None
- Configuration updates: Review the formatting changes introduced in
ruffversion^0.9.0and update the codebase accordingly. - Testing requirements: Run linting and formatting checks to ensure the codebase adheres to the new rules.
3.2 Important Improvements
🟡 P1 (Should Fix):
- Issue: Ensure compatibility with other dependencies.
- Current Impact:
- Performance implications: None
- Maintenance overhead: None
- Future scalability: None
- Suggested Solution:
- Implementation approach: Verify that the updated
ruffversion is compatible with other dependencies in the project. - Migration strategy: Update the
ruffversion and run compatibility tests. - Testing considerations: Ensure that all linting and formatting checks pass without issues.
- Implementation approach: Verify that the updated
3.3 Minor Suggestions
🟢 P2 (Consider):
- Area: Documentation updates.
- Improvement Opportunity:
- Code quality enhancement: Update the project documentation to reflect the changes in linting and formatting rules introduced by
ruffversion^0.9.0. - Best practice alignment: Ensure that the documentation provides clear guidelines on the new formatting rules.
- Documentation updates: Update the documentation to include information on the new formatting rules and any changes in linting behavior.
- Code quality enhancement: Update the project documentation to reflect the changes in linting and formatting rules introduced by
4. Requirements Analysis
4.1 Functional Coverage
- Requirements mapping:
- Implemented features: Update
ruffdependency to version^0.9.0. - Missing elements: None
- Edge cases handling: Ensure that the new formatting rules do not introduce inconsistencies in the codebase.
- Implemented features: Update
- Business Logic:
- Use case coverage: The update ensures that the codebase adheres to the latest linting and formatting standards.
- Business rule implementation: None
- Data flow correctness: None
4.2 Non-functional Aspects
- Performance metrics: N/A
- Security considerations: N/A
- Scalability factors: N/A
- Maintainability aspects: Regularly updating dependencies helps maintain the codebase and ensures compatibility with the latest tools and libraries.
5. Testing Strategy
- Test Coverage:
- Unit test requirements: Ensure that all linting and formatting checks pass without issues.
- Integration test scenarios: Verify that the updated
ruffversion is compatible with other dependencies in the project. - Edge case validation: Test the codebase against the new formatting rules to ensure consistency.
- Quality Metrics:
- Current coverage: N/A
- Critical paths: N/A
- Performance benchmarks: N/A
6. Final Assessment
6.1 Key Action Items
-
Critical Changes (P0):
- Review the formatting changes introduced in
ruffversion^0.9.0and update the codebase accordingly.
- Review the formatting changes introduced in
-
Important Improvements (P1):
- Verify that the updated
ruffversion is compatible with other dependencies in the project.
- Verify that the updated
-
Suggested Enhancements (P2):
- Update the project documentation to reflect the changes in linting and formatting rules introduced by
ruffversion^0.9.0.
- Update the project documentation to reflect the changes in linting and formatting rules introduced by
6.2 Overall Evaluation
- Technical assessment: The update to
ruffversion^0.9.0introduces new formatting rules and stabilizes several existing rules, which may affect the codebase. Regularly updating dependencies helps maintain the codebase and ensures compatibility with the latest tools and libraries. - Business impact: Ensures the codebase is up-to-date with the latest linting and formatting rules, which can improve code quality and maintainability.
- Risk evaluation: There is a risk of formatting inconsistencies due to the new rules introduced in
ruffversion^0.9.0. - Implementation quality: The change is isolated to the
pyproject.tomlfile, which is appropriate for a dependency update. Updating dependencies regularly helps maintain the codebase and ensures compatibility with the latest tools and libraries.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #2044 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 83.19% 83.19%
=======================================
Files 12 12
Lines 488 488
=======================================
Hits 406 406
Misses 82 82 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
^0.8.0->^0.9.0Release Notes
astral-sh/ruff (ruff)
v0.9.0Compare Source
Check out the blog post for a migration guide and overview of the changes!
Breaking changes
Ruff now formats your code according to the 2025 style guide. As a result, your code might now get formatted differently. See the formatter section for a detailed list of changes.
This release doesn’t remove or remap any existing stable rules.
Stabilization
The following rules have been stabilized and are no longer in preview:
stdlib-module-shadowing(A005).This rule has also been renamed: previously, it was called
builtin-module-shadowing.builtin-lambda-argument-shadowing(A006)slice-to-remove-prefix-or-suffix(FURB188)boolean-chained-comparison(PLR1716)decimal-from-float-literal(RUF032)post-init-default(RUF033)useless-if-else(RUF034)The following behaviors have been stabilized:
pytest-parametrize-names-wrong-type(PT006): Detectpytest.parametrizecalls outside decorators and calls with keyword arguments.module-import-not-at-top-of-file(E402): Ignorepytest.importorskipcalls between import statements.mutable-dataclass-default(RUF008) andfunction-call-in-dataclass-default-argument(RUF009): Add support forattrs.bad-version-info-comparison(PYI006): Extend the rule to check non-stub files.The following fixes or improvements to fixes have been stabilized:
redundant-numeric-union(PYI041)duplicate-union-members(PYI016)Formatter
This release introduces the new 2025 stable style (#13371), stabilizing the following changes:
ISC001incompatibility warning (#15123)assertmessage over breaking the assertion expression (#9457)ifguards inmatchcaseclauses (#13513)matchcasepatterns (#6933)ifkeyword for comprehensions where the condition has a leading comment (#12282)withstatements with a single context manager for Python 3.8 or older (#10276)max-doc-code-line-length = "dynamic"(#13523)Preview features
flake8-bugbear] Implementclass-as-data-structure(B903) (#9601)flake8-type-checking] Applyquoted-type-aliasmore eagerly inTYPE_CHECKINGblocks and ignore it in stubs (TC008) (#15180)pylint] Ignoreeq-without-hashin stub files (PLW1641) (#15310)pyupgrade] SplitUP007into two individual rules:UP007forUnionandUP045forOptional(UP007,UP045) (#15313)ruff] New rule that detects classes that are both an enum and adataclass(RUF049) (#15299)ruff] RecodeRUF025toRUF037(RUF037) (#15258)Rule changes
flake8-builtins] Ignorestdlib-module-shadowingin stub files(A005) (#15350)flake8-return] Add support for functions returningtyping.Never(RET503) (#15298)Server
logLevelserver settingwhich defaults to
info. This addresses the issue where users were notified about an error and told to consult the log, but it didn’t contain any messages. (#15232)CLI
--config key=valuewhen thekeyis for a table and it’s a simplevalueBug fixes
eradicate] Ignore metadata blocks directly followed by normal blocks (ERA001) (#15330)flake8-django] Recognize other magic methods (DJ012) (#15365)pycodestyle] Avoid false positives related to type aliases (E252) (#15356)pydocstyle] Avoid treating newline-separated sections as sub-sections (D405) (#15311)pyflakes] Remove call when removing final argument fromformat(F523) (#15309)refurb] Mark fix as unsafe when the right-hand side is a string (FURB171) (#15273)ruff] Treat)as a regex metacharacter (RUF043,RUF055) (#15318)ruff] Parenthesize theint-call argument when removing theintcall would change semantics (RUF046) (#15277)Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.