Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

debug: Add Upterm step in GHA to debug what's happening #908

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nightscape
Copy link
Owner

@nightscape nightscape commented Dec 18, 2024

PR Type

enhancement


Description

  • Introduced a new step in the CI workflow to set up an Upterm session for debugging purposes.
  • Configured Upterm to limit access to the GitHub actor and specific users (nightscape).
  • Standardized the quotation marks in the workflow file for consistency.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
ci.yml
Add Upterm session setup to CI workflow                                   

.github/workflows/ci.yml

  • Added a new step to set up an Upterm session in the CI workflow.
  • Configured Upterm with restricted access to specific users and the
    actor.
  • Minor formatting changes to unify quotation marks in the workflow
    file.
  • +7/-2     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 Security concerns

    Potential security issue:
    The Upterm session setup could expose the CI environment to unauthorized access if the limit-access-to-actor or limit-access-to-users settings are misconfigured or bypassed. Verify that these settings are robust and tested.

    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Security Concern
    The addition of the Upterm session setup introduces potential security risks. Ensure that the limit-access-to-actor and limit-access-to-users configurations are strictly enforced and cannot be bypassed.

    Workflow Consistency
    The quotation marks for branches were standardized, but ensure that this change does not inadvertently affect branch matching behavior in the CI workflow.

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Security
    Make the Upterm access restriction configurable to prevent hardcoding user access

    Ensure that the limit-access-to-users parameter in the Upterm setup step is
    dynamically configurable or includes all necessary users to avoid unintended access
    restrictions.

    .github/workflows/ci.yml [133]

    -limit-access-to-users: nightscape
    +limit-access-to-users: ${{ secrets.UPTERM_ALLOWED_USERS }}
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: The suggestion addresses a security concern by replacing a hardcoded user with a configurable secret, enhancing flexibility and reducing the risk of unauthorized access.

    9
    Validate that Upterm session access is securely limited to the triggering actor

    Verify that the limit-access-to-actor parameter is correctly set to true to restrict
    session access to the triggering actor, ensuring secure debugging.

    .github/workflows/ci.yml [132]

    -limit-access-to-actor: true
    +limit-access-to-actor: ${{ secrets.UPTERM_LIMIT_TO_ACTOR }}
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: While the suggestion ensures secure session access, it is less impactful as the existing code already sets limit-access-to-actor to true. The proposed change adds configurability but is not as critical as the first suggestion.

    7

    @nightscape nightscape force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from 6b58ec4 to 6866cb1 Compare December 18, 2024 12:49
    @nightscape nightscape closed this Dec 24, 2024
    @nightscape nightscape deleted the debug-publishing branch December 30, 2024 22:58
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant