Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrige type identifiant Domibus #42

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

egaillot
Copy link
Collaborator

@egaillot egaillot commented Nov 22, 2024

Jusqu'ici, on utilise comme typeId la valeur urn:oasis:names:tc:ebcore:partyid-type:unregistered:oots-simulator… considéré comme invalide par les validateurs fournis par la Commission Européenne.

Ce commit fait apparaître comme typeId la valeur acceptée urn:oasis:names:tc:ebcore:partyid-type:unregistered:oots.

(Corrige issue #39)

⚠️ Une fois ce changement reversé dans main, il faudra modifier en local le fichier (non versionné) .env.oots, et mettre à jour la configuration PMode dans Domibus.

Jusqu'ici, on utilise comme typeId la valeur
`urn:oasis:names:tc:ebcore:partyid-type:unregistered:oots-simulator`…
considéré comme invalide par les validateurs fournis par la Commission
Européenne.

Ce commit fait apparaître comme typeId la valeur
acceptée `urn:oasis:names:tc:ebcore:partyid-type:unregistered:oots`.
@egaillot egaillot added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 22, 2024
@egaillot egaillot requested a review from Fabinout November 22, 2024 16:56
@egaillot egaillot self-assigned this Nov 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Fabinout Fabinout left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@egaillot egaillot merged commit 904b2d2 into main Nov 25, 2024
3 checks passed
@egaillot egaillot deleted the correction-type-identifiant-domibus branch November 25, 2024 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants