Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add definitions to terms for neurons that lack them #2937

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AvolaAmg
Copy link
Collaborator

@AvolaAmg AvolaAmg commented Feb 7, 2025

Fixes #2342

@AvolaAmg AvolaAmg self-assigned this Feb 7, 2025
@dosumis dosumis requested a review from gouttegd February 21, 2025 15:41
Copy link
Collaborator

@gouttegd gouttegd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues with the definitions, but CL:0000109 should not be purely removed from the ontology, it must be properly obsoleted instead.

@@ -4668,13 +4667,6 @@ AnnotationAssertion(oboInOwl:hasDbXref obo:CL_0000108 "WBbt:0006840")
AnnotationAssertion(rdfs:label obo:CL_0000108 "cholinergic neuron")
EquivalentClasses(obo:CL_0000108 ObjectIntersectionOf(obo:CL_0000540 ObjectSomeValuesFrom(obo:RO_0002215 obo:GO_0014055)))

# Class: obo:CL_0000109 (adrenergic neuron)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is that term removed because it “should be a synonym of noradrenergic neuron” (as stated in this comment)?

Terms should never be entirely removed like that. They should be obsoleted instead – kept around, but clearly marked as obsolete with a owl:deprecated annotation.

@@ -4554,5 +4552,5 @@



<!-- Generated by the OWL API (version 4.5.29) https://github.com/owlcs/owlapi -->
<!-- Generated by the OWL API (version 4.5.26.2023-07-17T20:34:13Z) https://github.com/owlcs/owlapi -->
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Has this file been modified with Protégé?

This file is automatically generated from the mappings between CL and foreign ontologies. It should not be manually edited.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add definitions to terms for neurons that lack them
2 participants