We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In MA, both uvea and choroid are sibling parts of the anterior eye
[Term] id: MA:0002480 name: uvea namespace: adult_mouse_anatomy.gxd **relationship: BFO:0000050 MA:0002484 ! eye anterior segment [Term] id: MA:0000263 name: choroid namespace: adult_mouse_anatomy.gxd **relationship: BFO:0000050 MA:0002484 ! eye anterior segment
is this correct?
First I think choroid is usually considered part of uvea.
Second I think that the choroid tends to be largely in the posterior segment?
So choroid would need moved, and uvea would span both A+P?
EMAPA is similar:
[Term] id: EMAPA:35901 name: uvea namespace: anatomical_structure relationship: ends_at TS28 ! TS28 relationship: part_of EMAPA:18231 ! eye anterior chamber relationship: starts_at TS28 ! TS28
but at least here choroid is A/P neutral:
[Term] id: EMAPA:19077 name: choroid namespace: anatomical_structure relationship: ends_at TS28 ! TS28 relationship: part_of EMAPA:16198 ! eye relationship: starts_at TS21 ! TS21
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixes uvea po anterior eyeball. See also obophenotype/mouse-anatomy-o…
33fb5e4
…ntology#113
No branches or pull requests
In MA, both uvea and choroid are sibling parts of the anterior eye
is this correct?
First I think choroid is usually considered part of uvea.
Second I think that the choroid tends to be largely in the posterior segment?
So choroid would need moved, and uvea would span both A+P?
EMAPA is similar:
but at least here choroid is A/P neutral:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: