Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: show a more detailed error on Bad Request #1468

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pomegranited
Copy link
Contributor

@pomegranited pomegranited commented Nov 5, 2024

Description

Show a detailed error when 400 Bad Request received while adding a component to a library, either a new or pasted component. The most likely error from the backend here is "library can only have {max} components", and since this error is translated already, we can just report it through.

Content Authors using Libraries v2 are affected by this change.

Error shown on paste:

image

Error shown on create:

image

Supporting information

Relates to: #1456
Private-ref: FAL-3873

Testing instructions

  1. Manually decrease settings.MAX_BLOCKS_PER_CONTENT_LIBRARY in the backend to a suitable limit for testing.
  2. Try to add more than settings.MAX_BLOCKS_PER_CONTENT_LIBRARY blocks to a content library
  3. Confirm that the updated toast error is legible and helpful.

while creating a component to a library: report the "max components"
limit from the backend
@pomegranited pomegranited requested a review from a team as a code owner November 5, 2024 07:06
@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Nov 5, 2024
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, @pomegranited!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/2u-tnl. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@navinkarkera navinkarkera left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pomegranited This works while creating new component but we also need to display the same error while pasting component.

Copy link
Contributor

@DanielVZ96 DanielVZ96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tested it and it works correctly, but I second navin's comment about handling the pasting error.

Refactors parsePasteErrorMsg function and tests to share error response
parsing logic between paste and create.
@pomegranited
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ach, sorry I missed the "paste" part, and thank you for catching this @navinkarkera and @DanielVZ96.

d0cad7e refactors the parsePasteErrorMsg logic and related tests to work with both create and paste.

try {
const { customAttributes: { httpErrorResponseData } } = error;
errMsg = JSON.parse(httpErrorResponseData).block_type;
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pomegranited pomegranited Nov 6, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: this line was erroring out, because the error response didn't (ever?) contain a block_type. So when I pasted a component and was over the limit, the toast would disappear without showing me an error at all. This refactor ensures an error message is shown, with detail if we have it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because the error response didn't (ever?)

It does return block_type here but it seems like the use of IncompatibleTypesError exception was removed now. I cannot find any place where it is raised.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.27%. Comparing base (fc94667) to head (d0cad7e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1468   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.27%   93.27%           
=======================================
  Files        1052     1052           
  Lines       20496    20505    +9     
  Branches     4393     4314   -79     
=======================================
+ Hits        19118    19127    +9     
- Misses       1315     1318    +3     
+ Partials       63       60    -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@DanielVZ96 DanielVZ96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 LGTM

  • I tested this: (describe what you tested)
  • I read through the code
  • I checked for accessibility issues
  • Includes documentation

Copy link
Contributor

@navinkarkera navinkarkera left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pomegranited Looks good and thanks for the tests refactor 👍

  • I tested this: (Verified error messages for block limit and unsupported block types)
  • I read through the code
  • I checked for accessibility issues
  • Includes documentation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U
Projects
Status: Needs Triage
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants