Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation for using contextual tuples in Expand API #209

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

sujitha-av
Copy link
Contributor

@sujitha-av sujitha-av commented Oct 27, 2024

Description

Adds documentation on use of contextual tuples with Expand API

References

#951 in openfga

Review Checklist

  • I have clicked on "allow edits by maintainers".
  • I have added documentation for new/changed functionality in this PR or in a PR to openfga.dev [Provide a link to any relevant PRs in the references section above]
  • The correct base branch is being used, if not main
  • I have added tests to validate that the change in functionality is working as expected.

@sujitha-av sujitha-av requested review from a team as code owners October 27, 2024 12:44
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Oct 27, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: sujitha-av / name: Sujitha A V (b5e432b)
  • ✅ login: miparnisari / name: Maria Ines Parnisari (f1642cb, 689a6f9)

@miparnisari
Copy link
Member

@sujitha-av please git merge origin/main

@sujitha-av sujitha-av force-pushed the documentation-expand-api branch from 027c2c2 to b5e432b Compare November 5, 2024 02:36
@sujitha-av
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is a separate documentation PR needed for openfga.dev? As far as I checked there is not particular documentation for usage of contextual tuples with each of the request types. I can proceed if it is required.

@miparnisari miparnisari merged commit 24dec68 into openfga:main Dec 4, 2024
6 checks passed
aaguiarz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants