MGMT-19174: [cloud_hotfix_release] add rpms signature scan

[pastequo]

Release pipeline ECP will make this task mandatory starting November 1st

List all the issues related to this PR

• New Feature
• Enhancement
• Bug fix
• Tests
• Documentation
• CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

• Automation (CI, tools, etc)
• Cloud
• Operator Managed Deployments
• None

How was this code tested?

• assisted-test-infra environment
• dev-scripts environment
• Reviewer's test appreciated
• Waiting for CI to do a full test run
• Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
• No tests needed

Checklist

• Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
• Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
• This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
• Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

• Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
• Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
• Should this PR be backported?

[openshift-ci-robot]

@pastequo: This pull request references MGMT-19174 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Release pipeline ECP will make this task mandatory starting November 1st

List all the issues related to this PR

• New Feature
• Enhancement
• Bug fix
• Tests
• Documentation
• CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

• Automation (CI, tools, etc)
• Cloud
• Operator Managed Deployments
• None

How was this code tested?

• assisted-test-infra environment
• dev-scripts environment
• Reviewer's test appreciated
• Waiting for CI to do a full test run
• Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
• No tests needed

Checklist

• Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
• Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
• This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
• Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

• Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
• Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
• Should this PR be backported?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[pastequo]

/retest

[pastequo]

/retest

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pastequo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [pastequo]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@pastequo: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/edge-verify-generated-code	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-verify-generated-code
ci/prow/edge-unit-test	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-unit-test
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-mtv-4-17	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-mtv-4-17
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-lvm	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-lvm
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-day2-single-node	cbc9580	link	false	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-day2-single-node
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-cnv-4-17	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-cnv-4-17
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-ipv4v6	cbc9580	link	false	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-ipv4v6
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-day2	cbc9580	link	false	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-day2
ci/prow/edge-ci-index	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-ci-index
ci/prow/edge-images	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-images
ci/prow/edge-subsystem-kubeapi-aws	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-subsystem-kubeapi-aws
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-static-ip-suite	cbc9580	link	false	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-static-ip-suite
ci/prow/e2e-agent-compact-ipv4	cbc9580	link	true	/test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-bond	cbc9580	link	false	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-bond
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-static-ip-suite-4-14	cbc9580	link	false	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-static-ip-suite-4-14
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-odf-4-17	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-odf-4-17
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-single-node	cbc9580	link	false	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-single-node
ci/prow/edge-assisted-operator-catalog-publish-verify	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-assisted-operator-catalog-publish-verify
ci/prow/edge-subsystem-aws	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-subsystem-aws
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted
ci/prow/edge-e2e-ai-operator-ztp	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-e2e-ai-operator-ztp
ci/prow/edge-lint	cbc9580	link	true	/test edge-lint
ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted-bond-4-14	cbc9580	link	false	/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-bond-4-14
ci/prow/mce-images	cbc9580	link	true	/test mce-images
ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-static-ip-suite	7e81e39	link	true	/test e2e-metal-assisted-static-ip-suite
ci/prow/unit-test	7e81e39	link	true	/test unit-test
ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-single-node	7e81e39	link	true	/test e2e-metal-assisted-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted	7e81e39	link	false	/test e2e-metal-assisted
ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-ipv4v6	7e81e39	link	true	/test e2e-metal-assisted-ipv4v6
ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted-day2	7e81e39	link	true	/test e2e-metal-assisted-day2
ci/prow/images	7e81e39	link	true	/test images

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.