-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix the nil pointing issue #239
Fix the nil pointing issue #239
Conversation
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/e5f9afcb28c94830a8dd64c14515de57 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 3h 21m 55s |
recheck |
@eshulman2 here is the reason of the previous job failure (seems to be related to ansibletest):
|
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/b65214189a2946a9a4e95f85e7e94005 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 3h 22m 27s |
yes I assumed it might cause an issue in the way it is defined right now, I'm waiting for a setup to work on this |
9ad0c7f
to
98c3b0e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me! Just one small thing. Nested if-statement is not needed. Go uses short circuit evaluation.
98c3b0e
to
bcf1fa1
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/177e3644b9a34f09a429b6c6ab658ee8 ❌ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider RETRY_LIMIT in 3m 30s |
Gates are broken until this patch is merged openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2526 :( |
recheck |
When a workflow is set without ExtraConfigMap in ansible controller the pod won't be able to start because the pointer won't be pointing at nothing. Changed the condition to allow avoiding this issue. not tested, waiting for a test enviornment to work on this Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-11191
bcf1fa1
to
ec466fd
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me! 👍
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: eshulman2, lpiwowar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherry-pick 18.0-fr1 |
@lpiwowar: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
28d0922
into
openstack-k8s-operators:main
@lpiwowar: new pull request created: #242 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
When a workflow is set without ExtraConfigMap in ansible controller the pod won't be able to start because the pointer won't be pointing at nothing. Changed the condition to allow avoiding this issue.
Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-11191